Xiaomi consistently delivers impressive smartphones at competitive prices. The Redmi K40 Gaming and Poco F3 GT are two such contenders, both packing the Dimensity 1200 chipset and targeting gamers. But which one truly reigns supreme? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
Both phones offer excellent performance thanks to the Dimensity 1200. The Redmi K40 Gaming edges out the Poco F3 GT with its superior cooling system and slightly better display, making it the preferred choice for serious mobile gamers. However, the Poco F3 GT often offers a more aggressive price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 27 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 30 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5065 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Silver, Bruce Lee Yellow | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | M2012K10C, M2104K10AC | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming
- Superior cooling system
- Higher refresh rate display (144Hz)
- Potentially better camera quality
- More versatile camera setup
- May be slightly more expensive
- Design might be less appealing to some
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Often more affordable
- Stylish design
- Fast charging (67W)
- Good performance for the price
- Less effective cooling system
- Lower refresh rate display (120Hz)
- Potentially lower camera quality
Display Comparison
The Redmi K40 Gaming typically features a slightly higher refresh rate (144Hz vs 120Hz on the F3 GT) and potentially better color accuracy, contributing to a smoother and more immersive gaming experience. Both use AMOLED panels, so expect vibrant colors and deep blacks. The K40 Gaming may also have a higher touch sampling rate.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi K40 Gaming generally boasts a more versatile camera system, often including a higher resolution primary sensor and potentially improved image processing algorithms. While both phones offer decent camera capabilities, the K40 Gaming tends to produce slightly better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Expect similar ultrawide and macro lenses on both.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 1200, ensuring flagship-level performance. However, the Redmi K40 Gaming often incorporates a more robust vapor chamber cooling system, allowing it to maintain peak performance for longer durations during intense gaming sessions. The Poco F3 GT might experience some thermal throttling under prolonged heavy load.
Battery Life
Both phones offer 67W fast charging, achieving a full charge in approximately 42 minutes. Battery capacity is generally similar (around 4500-5000 mAh), resulting in comparable battery life under typical usage. Gaming will drain the battery faster on both devices.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming is ideal for dedicated mobile gamers who prioritize sustained performance and a vibrant display. The Poco F3 GT is a great choice for budget-conscious users who still want a powerful phone with a stylish design and fast charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 1200 chipset good for gaming?
Yes, the Dimensity 1200 is a powerful chipset capable of handling demanding mobile games at high settings. However, sustained performance can be affected by thermal throttling.
❓ Which phone has better cooling?
The Redmi K40 Gaming generally has a more advanced cooling system, including a vapor chamber, which helps to prevent thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Are the cameras on these phones comparable?
While both offer decent camera performance, the Redmi K40 Gaming typically has a slight edge in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, due to its potentially better sensors and image processing.
