Xiaomi Redmi K30i 5G vs OnePlus 8T+ 5G: A Detailed Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 8T+ 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset delivers significantly better performance, and the 65W charging is a game-changer, reaching 100% in just 39 minutes. While the K30i offers good value, the 8T+'s performance advantage justifies the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K30i 5G | OnePlus 8T+ 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 41, 78 Sub6 | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 25. Released 2020, June 07 | 2020, October 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, October 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 76.6 x 8.8 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 160.7 x 74.1 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | - |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | Fluid AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 11 | Android 11, OxygenOS 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm 2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm, depth sensor | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (market dependant) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 39 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, White, Red, Purple | Aquamarine Green, Lunar Silver |
| Models | - | KB2007 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 640 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi K30i 5G
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- 5G connectivity
- Significantly slower charging
- Less powerful processor compared to the 8T+
- Potential for throttling under heavy load
OnePlus 8T+ 5G
- Much faster 65W charging
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 865 processor
- Better thermal management
- Higher price tag
- May not be significantly better for basic tasks
- Potentially larger physical size
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature LCD panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The 8T+'s Snapdragon 865 can handle more complex graphical rendering, potentially resulting in smoother animations and a more responsive user experience. The K30i's Snapdragon 765G, while capable, will exhibit more noticeable slowdowns under heavy load. We can assume both have similar refresh rates, but the 865's GPU will provide a more consistent frame rate in games.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the 8T+ likely benefits from a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Snapdragon 865, leading to improved image processing, dynamic range, and low-light performance. The K30i's ISP, while competent, won't match the capabilities of the 865. We can assume both phones will have a similar range of camera features, but the 8T+ will likely produce more refined and detailed images.
Performance
The heart of the difference is the chipset: Qualcomm's SM7250 Snapdragon 765G in the K30i versus the SM8250 Snapdragon 865 in the 8T+. The 865 boasts a significantly faster prime core (2.84 GHz Cortex-A77) compared to the K30i's 2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime. This translates to a substantial performance uplift in CPU-intensive tasks like video editing and multitasking. The 865 also features a more powerful GPU, offering a better gaming experience. The 7nm+ process node of the 865 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Redmi K30i 5G offers 30W wired charging, while the OnePlus 8T+ 5G leaps ahead with 65W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 39 minutes. This is a massive advantage for users who prioritize convenience. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the 8T+ effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The 8T+'s charging speed is a clear win for those who need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K30i 5G if you prioritize budget-friendliness and are willing to compromise on raw processing power and charging speed. It's a solid option for everyday tasks and light gaming. Buy the OnePlus 8T+ 5G if you demand smoother performance for demanding apps and games, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging. It's ideal for power users and those who frequently find themselves needing a quick top-up.