Xiaomi Redmi K30 vs. vivo X50 Pro+: A Detailed Comparison of Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and camera capabilities, the vivo X50 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the K30’s Snapdragon 730G. However, the Redmi K30 remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers who value excellent battery life and a smooth user experience for everyday tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K30 | vivo X50 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December 10. Released 2019, December 20 | 2020, June 01. Released 2020, July 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front, eco leather back or glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 76.6 x 8.8 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 158.5 x 73 x 8.8 mm (6.24 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 192.2 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 11 | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.1, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm 2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm, depth sensor | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 27W wired, 100% in 68 min | 44W wired, 62% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | 4350 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Red, Purple | Blue, Brown |
| Models | M1912G7BE, M1912G7BC | V2011A |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 630 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -94.0dB / Crosstalk -93.0dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 101h | Endurance rating 93h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1378:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 218200 (v7), 272229 (v8) GeekBench: 7008 (v4.4), 1692 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 621433 (v8) GeekBench: 3411 (v5.1) GFXBench: 43fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K30
- Exceptional battery life (101h endurance)
- More affordable price point
- Capable performance for everyday tasks
- Significantly less powerful chipset
- Slower charging speed
vivo X50 Pro+
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 865
- Faster 44W charging
- Superior camera capabilities (expected)
- Shorter battery life (93h endurance)
- Higher price tag
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays geared towards immersive viewing, but differ in their technical execution. The Redmi K30 boasts a measured peak brightness of 714 nits and a 1378:1 contrast ratio, providing a vibrant image. The X50 Pro+ advertises an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting a true OLED panel capable of perfect blacks. While the K30’s brightness is respectable, the X50 Pro+’s OLED technology will deliver superior color accuracy and dynamic range, enhancing content consumption. The lack of specific refresh rate data for the K30 means the X50 Pro+ likely offers a smoother experience if it includes a higher refresh rate panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but the X50 Pro+ is expected to excel due to its flagship positioning. While specific sensor details are missing, the X50 Pro+ likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Snapdragon 865’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced, enabling better noise reduction and dynamic range. The Redmi K30’s camera system is likely competent for everyday photography, but will struggle to match the X50 Pro+’s low-light performance and overall image quality. The absence of detailed camera specs for both phones makes a precise comparison difficult, but the X50 Pro+’s chipset and presumed sensor size give it a clear advantage.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The vivo X50 Pro+ is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+), featuring an octa-core CPU with a prime Cortex-A77 core clocked at 2.84 GHz. This architecture, built on a smaller 7nm+ process, delivers significantly higher processing power and improved efficiency compared to the Redmi K30’s Snapdragon 730G (8nm). The K30’s CPU, while capable, utilizes Kryo 470 cores clocked lower, resulting in noticeable performance differences in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The 865 also benefits from a more powerful Adreno GPU, further widening the performance disparity.
Battery Life
The Redmi K30 edges out the X50 Pro+ in endurance, boasting a 101-hour rating versus the X50 Pro+'s 93-hour rating. However, this doesn’t tell the whole story. The X50 Pro+ compensates with significantly faster charging – 44W wired, achieving 62% charge in just 30 minutes – compared to the K30’s 27W charging, which takes 68 minutes for a full charge. This means while the K30 lasts longer on a single charge, the X50 Pro+ can quickly top up when needed. The more efficient Snapdragon 865 in the X50 Pro+ also helps mitigate the impact of its slightly smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K30 if you need exceptional battery endurance and a capable all-rounder for daily use without breaking the bank. It’s ideal for users who prioritize longevity and aren’t demanding mobile gamers. Buy the vivo X50 Pro+ if you prefer a flagship-level experience with superior performance for gaming and demanding applications, coupled with a more advanced camera system for photography enthusiasts.