Xiaomi Redmi K30 vs Realme X50 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and value, the Xiaomi Redmi K30 is the better choice. Its 101-hour endurance rating significantly outlasts the X50 Pro’s 90 hours. However, the Realme X50 Pro 5G is the clear winner for power users demanding the fastest possible performance and charging speeds.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K30 | Realme X50 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December 10. Released 2019, December 20 | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, March 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 76.6 x 8.8 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 11 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.5, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm 2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm, depth sensor | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 27W wired, 100% in 68 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Red, Purple | Moss Green, Rust Red |
| Models | M1912G7BE, M1912G7BC | RMX2075, RMX2071, RMX2076 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -94.0dB / Crosstalk -93.0dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 101h | Endurance rating 90h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1378:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 218200 (v7), 272229 (v8) GeekBench: 7008 (v4.4), 1692 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 592447 (v8) GeekBench: 3175 (v5.1) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K30
- Exceptional battery life (101h endurance)
- Brighter display (714 nits)
- More affordable price point
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 730G)
- Slower charging speed (68 minutes)
Realme X50 Pro 5G
- Flagship-level performance (Snapdragon 865)
- Ultra-fast 65W charging (35 minutes)
- Likely superior camera system
- Shorter battery life (90h endurance)
- Lower peak display brightness (635 nits)
- Higher price
Display Comparison
The Realme X50 Pro 5G boasts an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (likely marketing for a high-quality AMOLED), but the Redmi K30 delivers a measured 1378:1 contrast ratio, still providing excellent visual separation. More crucially, the K30 achieves a peak brightness of 714 nits, significantly exceeding the X50 Pro’s 635 nits. This translates to better outdoor visibility for the K30. While both are likely 120Hz displays (not specified in data, but common for the era), the K30’s higher brightness gives it an edge in real-world usability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is absent. Given the market positioning, the X50 Pro likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially more advanced image processing. The Snapdragon 865’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also superior, enabling better dynamic range and low-light performance. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the X50 Pro’s flagship chipset suggests a more capable camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X50 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) is a substantial upgrade over the Redmi K30’s Snapdragon 730G (8nm). The 865 features a more advanced CPU architecture – Cortex-A77 cores versus the K30’s Kryo 470 – and a significantly more powerful GPU. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The 7nm+ process node of the 865 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, though sustained loads will still generate heat. The K30’s 730G is capable, but will struggle with the most demanding titles at maximum settings.
Battery Life
The Redmi K30’s endurance rating of 101 hours is a clear win over the X50 Pro’s 90 hours, despite the latter having a larger battery (assumed, based on chipset power draw). This is due to the more efficient Snapdragon 730G and likely optimized software. However, the X50 Pro compensates with incredibly fast 65W wired charging, reaching 100% in just 35 minutes, compared to the K30’s 68 minutes. This difference in charging speed is substantial and a major advantage for the X50 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K30 if you need exceptional battery life, a bright and usable display, and a solid all-around experience without breaking the bank. It’s ideal for everyday users, media consumers, and those who prioritize longevity. Buy the Realme X50 Pro 5G if you prefer uncompromising performance for gaming and demanding applications, and if rapid 65W charging is a must-have feature. This phone caters to enthusiasts and power users.