The Realme X50 Pro Player and Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra represent a fascinating crossroads in the smartphone market. Both devices aimed to deliver flagship-level performance at a more accessible price point, but they took different approaches. The X50 Pro Player leveraged Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 865, while the K30 Ultra opted for MediaTek’s Dimensity 1000+. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which phone offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme X50 Pro Player emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset provides a performance edge, particularly in sustained workloads, and the significantly faster 65W charging is a game-changer. While the K30 Ultra offers a competitive package, the X50 Pro Player’s superior processing power and charging speed justify the potential price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 11. Released 2020, August 14 | 2020, May 25. Released 2020, June 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Unspecified), glass back (Unspecified), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.4 x 9.1 mm (6.43 x 2.97 x 0.36 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unspecified |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 12 | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.4, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP, f/2.2, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 29mm (standard), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio
| 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, QC4, 100% in 58 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Talk time | Up to 11 h 30 min (multimedia) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlight White, Midnight Black, Mint Green | Light Speed Silver, Phantom Black |
| Models | M2006J10C | RMX2072 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 350 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra
- Competitive price point
- MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ offers solid performance
- 33W fast charging with PD and QC4 support
- Snapdragon 865 offers superior performance
- Slower charging compared to the X50 Pro Player
Realme X50 Pro Player
- Powerful Snapdragon 865 chipset
- Ultra-fast 65W charging
- Superior GPU performance for gaming
- Potentially higher price
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature high refresh rate displays (based on market positioning), the provided data doesn't specify panel technology or resolution. However, the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. A smoother experience is more reliant on the chipset's ability to consistently deliver high frame rates than the display panel itself. The X50 Pro Player’s Snapdragon 865, with its more advanced GPU, is better equipped to handle graphically intensive games at high refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset plays a crucial role in image processing. The Snapdragon 865’s Spectra 480 ISP offers advanced features like HDR video capture and improved low-light performance. While both phones likely feature capable camera systems, the X50 Pro Player’s ISP provides a more sophisticated image processing pipeline. The absence of information regarding sensor size and OIS makes a definitive camera judgment impossible, but the Snapdragon’s processing advantage is a significant factor.
Performance
The Realme X50 Pro Player’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) holds a clear advantage over the Redmi K30 Ultra’s Dimensity 1000+ (7nm). The Snapdragon 865 features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core versus the K30 Ultra’s 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 cores. This, combined with the more refined 7nm+ process, translates to better single-core and multi-core performance. The X50 Pro Player’s Adreno 650 GPU also surpasses the Dimensity 1000+'s Mali-G76 MC9, offering superior graphics processing capabilities. This difference is particularly noticeable in demanding games and applications. The Snapdragon 865 also benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized software and driver support.
Battery Life
The Redmi K30 Ultra offers 33W wired charging, achieving a 100% charge in 58 minutes. The Realme X50 Pro Player, however, boasts a significantly faster 65W charging solution, reaching 100% in just 35 minutes. This 23-minute difference is substantial and caters to users who prioritize quick top-ups. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the X50 Pro Player effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery, offering more usable uptime throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra if you prioritize a balanced experience with a focus on value and don't require the absolute peak performance for demanding tasks. It's ideal for everyday users, media consumption, and casual gaming. Buy the Realme X50 Pro Player if you are a power user, mobile gamer, or someone who values the fastest possible charging speeds and a more robust chipset for future-proofing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 1000+ in the Redmi K30 Ultra struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 1000+ is a capable chipset, Genshin Impact and other graphically intensive titles will likely run at lower settings or with occasional frame drops compared to the Snapdragon 865 in the X50 Pro Player. The Snapdragon 865’s superior GPU and thermal management provide a more consistent gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 65W charging on the Realme X50 Pro Player in real-world use?
The 65W charging on the X50 Pro Player translates to a significant time saving. You can expect to gain several hours of usage with just a 15-20 minute charge, making it ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The 23-minute difference to a full charge is substantial.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 865 in the X50 Pro Player get noticeably hotter during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 865 can generate more heat under sustained load than the Dimensity 1000+. However, Realme likely implemented thermal management solutions to mitigate this. While some warmth is expected during prolonged gaming, it shouldn't lead to significant throttling or discomfort.
