Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra vs Oppo Find X2 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of 2020 Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user in 2024, the Oppo Find X2 Pro emerges as the slightly better choice. While the Redmi K30 Ultra delivers impressive performance, the Find X2 Pro’s superior display brightness (871 nits measured) and faster 65W charging (38 minutes to 100%) provide a more refined and convenient user experience, justifying its original higher price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra | Oppo Find X2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 11. Released 2020, August 14 | 2020, March 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.4 x 9.1 mm (6.43 x 2.97 x 0.36 in) | 165.2 x 74.4 x 8.8 mm (Ceramic) / 9.5mm (Leather) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 217 g (Ceramic) / 200 g (Leather) (7.05 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 12 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.2, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 129mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, QC4, 100% in 58 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min |
| Talk time | Up to 11 h 30 min (multimedia) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4260 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlight White, Midnight Black, Mint Green | Black, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition |
| Models | M2006J10C | CPH2025, PDEM30, OPG01 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 593717 (v8) GeekBench: 13245 (v4.4), 3269 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra
- Excellent performance with Dimensity 1000+ chipset
- Competitive price point, offering great value
- Solid battery life with 88-hour endurance
- Slower 33W charging compared to the Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Limited display information hinders a full comparison
Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Superior display brightness and contrast ratio
- Ultra-fast 65W charging (38 minutes to full)
- Likely better camera performance due to Oppo’s expertise
- Originally more expensive than the Redmi K30 Ultra
- Snapdragon 865 may exhibit more throttling under sustained load than the Dimensity 1000+
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X2 Pro boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 871 nits. While the K30 Ultra’s display specs aren’t provided, the Find X2 Pro’s brightness ensures excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. Furthermore, the Find X2 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior panel capable of deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The lack of detailed display information for the K30 Ultra makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Find X2 Pro clearly sets a high bar.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are described as having capable photo and video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details for either device, a definitive comparison is impossible. However, given Oppo’s historical focus on camera technology, the Find X2 Pro likely benefits from more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially a larger sensor, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The absence of information on the K30 Ultra’s camera system makes it difficult to assess its capabilities accurately.
Performance
Both devices utilize 7nm process technology, but the Snapdragon 865 in the Oppo Find X2 Pro benefits from a slightly more refined architecture. The Snapdragon 865’s CPU configuration (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) offers a higher peak clock speed on its prime core compared to the Redmi K30 Ultra’s Dimensity 1000+ (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). While real-world performance differences may be minimal for everyday tasks, the Snapdragon 865 is likely to exhibit a slight edge in sustained performance due to Qualcomm’s thermal management optimizations. The K30 Ultra’s Dimensity 1000+ still provides excellent performance, particularly in multi-core workloads, but the Snapdragon 865 holds a slight advantage.
Battery Life
Both the Redmi K30 Ultra and Oppo Find X2 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 88 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Oppo Find X2 Pro’s 65W wired charging can fully charge the battery in just 38 minutes, while the Redmi K30 Ultra takes 58 minutes with its 33W charging. This 20-minute difference is a substantial convenience factor for users who prioritize quick top-ups. The similar endurance ratings suggest that the K30 Ultra’s battery capacity is likely comparable to the Find X2 Pro’s, but the faster charging of the Oppo device provides a clear advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra if you prioritize raw processing power for gaming and demanding applications and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds. It’s the ideal choice for users who want maximum performance on a budget. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Pro if you value a superior display experience, faster charging, and a more polished overall package. This phone is best suited for users who prioritize multimedia consumption and convenience.