Redmi K30 Ultra vs Huawei P40 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Flagship Trade-offs
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user in 2024, the Redmi K30 Ultra offers a compelling package. Its Dimensity 1000+ chipset delivers strong performance, and its 33W charging is respectable. While the P40 Pro+ boasts superior camera hardware and wireless charging, its age and potential software limitations make the K30 Ultra the more practical choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra | Huawei P40 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 11. Released 2020, August 14 | 2020, March 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, June 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front, ceramic back, ceramic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.4 x 9.1 mm (6.43 x 2.97 x 0.36 in) | 158.2 x 72.6 x 9 mm (6.23 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 226 g (7.97 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1200 x 2640 pixels (~441 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) | OLED, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7 nm) | Kirin 990 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G76 MP16 |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 12 | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Leica optics, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.2, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/4.4, 240mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 40 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), 1/1.54", PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720@7680fps, 1080p@960fps, HDR; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF IR TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Infrared Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, QC4, 100% in 58 min | 40W wired 40W wireless 27W reverse wireless |
| Talk time | Up to 11 h 30 min (multimedia) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlight White, Midnight Black, Mint Green | White Ceramic, Black Ceramic |
| Models | M2006J10C | ELS-N39, ELS-AN10 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 1000 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 529687 (v8) GeekBench: 3203 (v5.1) GFXBench: 31fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra
- Strong performance with Dimensity 1000+ chipset
- Faster wired charging (58 minutes)
- More modern software experience
- Camera system likely less advanced than P40 Pro+
- Display brightness potentially lower than P40 Pro+
Huawei P40 Pro+
- Versatile and high-quality camera system
- 40W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging
- High peak display brightness (760 nits)
- Older chipset (Kirin 990 5G)
- Potential software limitations and ecosystem concerns
Display Comparison
The Huawei P40 Pro+ features a display capable of reaching 760 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the K30 Ultra’s display specs aren’t provided, its market positioning suggests a slightly less bright panel. The P40 Pro+’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) indicates a high-quality OLED panel, likely with excellent black levels. The absence of refresh rate information for the K30 Ultra means it likely doesn’t match the smoothness of some newer displays, but the P40 Pro+ doesn’t explicitly advertise a high refresh rate either, focusing instead on color accuracy and peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
The Huawei P40 Pro+ is clearly positioned as the camera champion. While specific sensor details are missing, its ‘Photo / Video’ designation and ‘Pro+’ branding indicate a sophisticated multi-camera system with advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS) and potentially periscope zoom lenses. The K30 Ultra, while capable, likely prioritizes overall value over cutting-edge camera technology. The P40 Pro+'s image processing is known for its vibrant colors and strong dynamic range, while the K30 Ultra likely offers a more natural, balanced look. The absence of details on the K30 Ultra’s camera system suggests it won’t compete directly with the P40 Pro+ in terms of sheer image quality or zoom capabilities.
Performance
The Redmi K30 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7nm) chipset utilizes an octa-core configuration with four high-performance Cortex-A77 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, paired with four efficiency cores. This contrasts with the Huawei P40 Pro+’s Kirin 990 5G (7nm+), which employs a more complex core arrangement – two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.86 GHz, two more Cortex-A76 cores at 2.36 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores at 1.95 GHz. While the Kirin 990 5G’s higher clock speeds on its primary cores suggest a theoretical performance advantage, the Dimensity 1000+’s newer architecture and efficient core design often translate to better sustained performance and thermal management in real-world gaming scenarios. The K30 Ultra’s focus on gaming is further supported by its likely optimized software.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 95 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing charging capabilities. The Huawei P40 Pro+ offers a more versatile charging solution with 40W wired charging, 40W wireless charging, and even 27W reverse wireless charging. The Redmi K30 Ultra supports 33W wired charging, along with PD and QC4 standards, achieving a full charge in 58 minutes. While the P40 Pro+’s wireless charging is a significant advantage, the K30 Ultra’s faster wired charging time and broader compatibility with charging standards make it a practical choice for users who primarily rely on wired power.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra if you prioritize raw performance for gaming and everyday tasks, and value a more modern software experience. It’s ideal for users who want a fast, responsive phone without breaking the bank. Buy the Huawei P40 Pro+ if you are a photography enthusiast who values a versatile camera system with excellent image quality, and are comfortable with the potential limitations of Huawei’s ecosystem and older software.