Launched within months of each other in 2020, the Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro and Realme X50 Pro 5G represented a pivotal moment in the flagship smartphone landscape – bringing premium Snapdragon 865 performance to a more accessible price point. Both devices aimed to disrupt the market, but they took different approaches, particularly in charging technology and overall user experience. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to help you determine which remains the better choice, even years later.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed and convenience, the Realme X50 Pro 5G emerges as the winner. Its 65W SuperDart charging, achieving a full charge in just 35 minutes, significantly outperforms the Redmi K30 Pro’s 30W charging. While both share the same Snapdragon 865 chipset, the faster charging and comparable battery life make the X50 Pro the more practical daily driver.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - China | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 24. Released 2020, March 27 | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, March 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.4 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 11 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.0 (128GB 6GB RAM)
UFS 3.1 (128GB 8/12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM) | UFS 3.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF
13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.5, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio
| 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 63 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Neon Blue, Phantom White, Electric Purple, Cyber Gray | Moss Green, Rust Red |
| Models | - | RMX2075, RMX2071, RMX2076 |
| Price | About 390 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 90h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-23.2 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 592447 (v8)
GeekBench: 3175 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro
- Potentially longer software support (Xiaomi's track record)
- Balanced feature set
- 30W charging with QC4 and PD3.0 compatibility
- Slower charging speed compared to Realme X50 Pro
- Limited display brightness information
Realme X50 Pro 5G
- Blazing-fast 65W SuperDart charging
- Higher peak display brightness (635 nits)
- Streamlined, performance-focused experience
- Potentially shorter software support lifecycle (Realme's history)
- Camera specifications are unknown
Display Comparison
Both the Redmi K30 Pro and Realme X50 Pro feature displays suitable for media consumption, but key differences exist. The Realme X50 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 635 nits, suggesting a more vibrant outdoor viewing experience compared to the Redmi K30 Pro (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize high refresh rate panels (a common feature of this era), the Realme’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) hints at potentially deeper blacks. Without detailed color accuracy data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Realme’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific sensor details. Without knowing megapixel counts, sensor sizes, or aperture values, a detailed camera comparison is impossible. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is unknown for either device. It’s safe to assume both offer a versatile camera system for everyday photography, but enthusiasts will likely find the lack of detailed specifications limiting. The omission of details suggests neither phone was positioned as a camera-centric flagship.
Performance
At the heart of both devices lies the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+). The CPU configuration is identical – an octa-core setup with 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means raw processing power will be nearly indistinguishable between the two. However, thermal management, which isn’t specified, could lead to differing sustained performance levels. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, ensuring fast data access. The 7nm+ fabrication process of the Snapdragon 865 is efficient, but sustained workloads could still induce throttling, making effective cooling crucial – a factor not detailed in the provided data.
Battery Life
The Realme X50 Pro 5G and Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro both achieve an endurance rating of 90 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds are dramatically different. The Realme X50 Pro’s 65W wired charging, supporting PD, can fully charge the device in just 35 minutes. In contrast, the Redmi K30 Pro’s 30W charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC4, takes 63 minutes for a full charge. This 28-minute difference is significant for users who prioritize quick top-ups. While both offer comparable endurance, the X50 Pro’s charging speed provides a substantial convenience advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro if you prioritize a slightly more balanced approach to features and potentially longer-term software support within the Xiaomi ecosystem. Buy the Realme X50 Pro 5G if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds and value a streamlined, performance-focused experience. The X50 Pro is the clear choice for users constantly on the go and needing to top up their battery quickly.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Realme X50 Pro's 65W charging generate excessive heat during prolonged use?
While 65W charging is incredibly fast, Realme implemented heat dissipation technologies to mitigate temperature increases. Reports from the time indicated minimal overheating during charging, and the phone's thermal management system effectively prevented performance throttling during typical use. However, sustained heavy gaming alongside charging could still lead to some heat buildup.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specifications a significant drawback for both the Redmi K30 Pro and Realme X50 Pro?
Yes, the absence of sensor size, aperture, and OIS information makes it difficult to assess the camera performance accurately. While both phones likely offer acceptable image quality for casual users, photography enthusiasts will find the lack of detail concerning. These phones weren't marketed as camera flagships, so the omission isn't entirely surprising.
❓ Will either the Redmi K30 Pro or Realme X50 Pro receive further major Android updates in 2024?
It's unlikely. Both devices launched with Android 10 and have likely received their final major OS updates. While security patches may continue for a limited time, expecting Android 14 or beyond is unrealistic. Xiaomi generally offers slightly longer software support than Realme, so the K30 Pro might receive patches for a bit longer.
