Xiaomi offers a plethora of smartphones, often blurring the lines between their Redmi and Poco brands. The Redmi K30 Pro Zoom and Poco F2 Pro both pack the powerful Snapdragon 865, but cater to slightly different audiences. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F2 Pro edges out the Redmi K30 Pro Zoom thanks to its slightly brighter display and exceptional battery life. While both offer flagship performance, the Poco's overall package provides better value for money, especially for users prioritizing longevity and outdoor visibility.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 77, 78 Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 24. Released 2020, April 04 | 2020, May 12 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, May 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.4 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 163.3 x 75.4 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 219 g (7.72 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 11 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1
6GB RAM (LPDDR4X)
8GB RAM (LPDDR5) |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
13 MP, 13mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF
13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio
| 24-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, QC4, 100% in 63 min | 30W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 63 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Grey, Purple, White, Blue | Neon Blue, Phantom White, Electric Purple, Cyber Gray |
| Models | - | M2004J11G |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.51 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.03 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 120h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.6 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 538221 (v8)
GeekBench: 3332 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Battery (old) | - | Endurance rating 120h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | 854 nits max brightness (measured) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 538221 (v8)
GeekBench: 3332 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro Zoom
- Slightly better camera (zoom capabilities)
- Faster charging (33W)
- Potentially more refined design
- Lower peak brightness display
- Shorter battery life
- Can be slightly more expensive
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
- Brighter display (854 nits)
- Exceptional battery life (120h endurance)
- Excellent value for money
- Slightly slower charging (30W)
- Camera slightly less versatile than K30 Pro Zoom
- Design may be less premium
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, but the Poco F2 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 854 nits, significantly brighter than the Redmi K30 Pro Zoom. This makes the Poco F2 Pro noticeably better for outdoor visibility. The Redmi K30 Pro Zoom's display is still excellent, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks, but lacks the Poco's punch. The Poco's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal claim, but generally indicates excellent contrast.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi K30 Pro Zoom is generally considered to have a slightly better camera system, particularly due to its periscope telephoto lens offering greater zoom capabilities. The Poco F2 Pro's camera is still very capable, producing excellent photos and videos in various conditions. Low-light performance is comparable on both.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Snapdragon 865 chipset, ensuring flagship-level performance. Expect smooth multitasking, responsive gaming, and effortless handling of demanding applications. There's virtually no discernible difference in real-world performance between the two.
Battery Life
The Poco F2 Pro shines in the battery department, boasting an endurance rating of 120 hours – a truly impressive figure. The Redmi K30 Pro Zoom's battery life is respectable, but falls short of the Poco's longevity. The Poco's 30W charging is slightly slower than the Redmi's 33W, but both offer relatively quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro Zoom is ideal for gamers and power users who prioritize a slightly more refined design and potentially better camera features (though both are good). The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is perfect for users seeking long battery life, a bright display for outdoor use, and a compelling price-to-performance ratio.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
Both phones offer excellent gaming performance thanks to the Snapdragon 865. The Redmi K30 Pro Zoom's slightly better cooling might give it a marginal edge in sustained gaming sessions, but the difference is minimal.
❓ Is the Poco F2 Pro worth buying in 2023/2024?
Absolutely! The Poco F2 Pro still offers incredible value for money, especially if you prioritize battery life and a bright display. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset remains powerful enough for most tasks.
