The Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G and Realme X50 5G represent a pivotal moment in mid-range 5G accessibility. Both devices launched around the same time, targeting a similar price bracket and crucially, both leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset. This comparison dissects the subtle, yet important, differences between these two phones to determine which offers the best overall package for the budget-conscious 5G user.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging, the Realme X50 5G emerges as the winner. Its ability to reach 70% charge in just 30 minutes provides a significant convenience factor. However, the Redmi K30 5G remains a strong contender, especially if a slightly longer charge time is acceptable for potentially better long-term value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 41, 78 Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, December 10. Released 2020, January 07 | 2020, July 08. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 76.6 x 8.8 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1
| UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm, depth sensor | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio
| 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 100% in 57 min | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Red, Purple, White | Jungle Green, Ice Silver |
| Models | M1912G7BE, M1912G7BC | RMX2144 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 500 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
- Identical Snapdragon 765G performance to the Realme X50 5G
- Potentially lower price point (depending on market)
- Full 100% charge achievable with 30W charging
- Slower charging speed compared to the Realme X50 5G
- Limited information on display quality and camera capabilities
Realme X50 5G
- Significantly faster charging – 70% in 30 minutes
- Identical Snapdragon 765G performance to the Redmi K30 5G
- Convenient for users needing quick power boosts
- May be slightly more expensive than the Redmi K30 5G
- Doesn't reach 100% charge as quickly
Display Comparison
Both devices share a similar display profile, though specific details like panel type and peak brightness aren't provided in the source data. Given their market positioning, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The focus here shifts to usability; the Realme X50 5G's faster charging could be more valuable than a marginally better display. Without specific data on color accuracy or refresh rates, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner in this category.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups to cater to the mid-range market. However, the absence of sensor size or aperture information prevents a meaningful analysis of image quality. It's reasonable to assume both will offer acceptable performance in good lighting conditions, but low-light capabilities will be heavily dependent on software processing and sensor quality – areas where brand-specific tuning plays a significant role.
Performance
The core performance is identical: both the Redmi K30 5G and Realme X50 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) chipset, featuring the same octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver). This means gaming performance and general app responsiveness will be virtually indistinguishable. Thermal management will likely depend on the internal cooling solutions, a detail not provided, but the 7nm process node of the 765G is relatively efficient, minimizing the risk of significant throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The battery performance is where a key difference emerges. Both devices utilize 30W wired charging, but the Realme X50 5G achieves 70% charge in 30 minutes, while the Redmi K30 5G requires 57 minutes for a full 100% charge. This indicates a potentially more efficient charging implementation in the Realme X50 5G, or a more conservative charging curve in the Redmi K30 5G to preserve battery health. While the Redmi K30 5G reaches full charge, the Realme X50 5G’s faster partial charge is more practical for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G if you need a phone that balances performance with a potentially lower overall cost, and aren't overly concerned with the absolute fastest charging speeds. Buy the Realme X50 5G if you prioritize minimizing downtime and want the convenience of a significantly quicker partial charge, making it ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost throughout the day.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 765G in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 765G is a capable mid-range chipset. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it can handle PUBG and Call of Duty at medium to high settings with acceptable frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense action, but overall, the gaming experience should be enjoyable on both the Redmi K30 5G and Realme X50 5G.
❓ Is the 30W charging on both phones compatible with Power Delivery (PD) chargers?
While both phones support 30W charging, compatibility with Power Delivery (PD) chargers isn't explicitly stated. It's likely they utilize Qualcomm's Quick Charge protocol. Using a PD charger *may* work, but it's not guaranteed to deliver the full 30W charging speed. It's best to use the charger included with the phone or a Quick Charge-compatible charger for optimal results.
❓ How does the 5G performance differ between the Redmi K30 5G and Realme X50 5G, considering they both use the same chipset?
The 5G performance will be largely identical, as both phones utilize the integrated 5G modem within the Snapdragon 765G. However, real-world 5G speeds will depend on network availability and signal strength in your location, not the phone itself. Antenna design *could* play a minor role, but the chipset is the primary determinant of 5G capability.
