Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G vs Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: Which 5G Phone Delivers More?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and potentially slightly better sustained performance, the Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G emerges as the winner. Its 30W charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the Moto G 5G Plus’s 20W, and the marginally higher CPU clock speed could translate to a smoother experience in demanding tasks. However, the Moto G 5G Plus offers comparable battery endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 41, 78 Sub6 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December 10. Released 2020, January 07 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 76.6 x 8.8 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm 2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm, depth sensor | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 100% in 57 min | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Red, Purple, White | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | M1912G7BE, M1912G7BC | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
- Faster 30W charging for quicker power-ups
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed for potential performance gains
- Snapdragon 765G offers a small edge in sustained performance
- Display specifications are incomplete, leaving brightness and panel type unknown
- Camera details are lacking, making image quality assessment difficult
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- Measured 543 nits peak brightness for excellent outdoor visibility
- Comparable battery endurance to the Redmi K30 5G
- 1269:1 contrast ratio delivers good image quality
- Slower 20W charging takes significantly longer to fully charge
- Slightly lower CPU clock speed compared to the Redmi K30 5G
Display Comparison
Both devices share a 1269:1 contrast ratio, indicating similar levels of black depth and image pop. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 543 nits, a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility. While the Redmi K30 5G’s display specs aren’t provided, the Moto G 5G Plus’s brightness level suggests a more usable experience in direct sunlight. The lack of information on the Redmi K30 5G’s panel type (LCD vs AMOLED) leaves a question mark regarding color vibrancy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature. The real differentiator will lie in the main sensor’s capabilities and the software algorithms employed for image processing, which remain unknown.
Performance
Both the Redmi K30 5G and Moto G 5G Plus are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm) and Snapdragon 765 (7nm) respectively. The K30 5G’s CPU features a slightly higher prime core clock speed of 2.4 GHz versus the Moto G 5G Plus’s 2.3 GHz. While seemingly minor, this difference, coupled with the 'G' variant of the 765 in the Redmi, suggests a small edge in sustained performance during gaming and intensive tasks. Both utilize an octa-core configuration with the same Kryo 475 architecture, ensuring a similar baseline experience for everyday use. The absence of RAM specifications necessitates caution; faster LPDDR5 RAM would benefit the Redmi K30 5G.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Redmi K30 5G’s 30W wired charging offers a significant advantage, achieving a 100% charge in just 57 minutes. The Moto G 5G Plus, with its 20W charging, will require considerably longer to fully replenish its battery. This difference is crucial for users who prioritize minimizing downtime and require quick top-ups throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G if you need faster charging speeds and are a power user who frequently pushes your phone with gaming or demanding applications. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you prioritize long battery life and a consistently smooth experience with less emphasis on peak performance or rapid replenishment of power.