Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro vs Huawei P30 Pro New Edition: Which Flagship Still Holds Up?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user in 2024, the Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 855 chipset delivers comparable performance to the Kirin 980, coupled with a longer endurance rating of 103 hours. While the P30 Pro boasts faster charging, the K20 Pro’s overall value proposition is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro | Huawei P30 Pro New Edition |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat21 1400/200 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, May 28. Released 2019, June 01 | 2020, May 12. Released 2020, June 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Aluminosilicate glass), glass back (Aluminosilicate glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 156.7 x 74.3 x 8.8 mm (6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 158 x 73.4 x 8.4 mm (6.22 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 2m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.47 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10 | OLED, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Kirin 980 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Mali-G76 MP10 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, MIUI 12 | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica optics, color spectrum sensor, dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.4, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 40 MP, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom, 10x hybrid zoom 20 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.7", PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (China only) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 27W wired, QC4 | 40W wired, 70% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Carbon black, Flame red, Glacier blue, Summer Honey, Pearl White | Aurora, Black, Silver Frost |
| Models | M1903F11I | - |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 820 EUR |
| SAR | 1.03 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.9dB / Crosstalk -94.2dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 103h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 71dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 84dB | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 368846 (v7), 437823 (v8) GeekBench: 10684 (v4.4), 2732 (v5.1) GFXBench: 36fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro
- Superior GPU performance for gaming
- Excellent battery endurance (103h)
- More affordable price point
- Slower charging speed compared to P30 Pro
- Lacks wireless charging
Huawei P30 Pro New Edition
- Faster 40W wired charging
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Potentially better low-light camera performance
- Slightly lower battery endurance
- Potentially limited software support
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays suitable for everyday use, but the Redmi K20 Pro’s measured 643 nits of peak brightness gives it a slight edge in outdoor visibility. While both boast an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED panels), the lack of detailed display specifications like refresh rate or panel type (LTPO, etc.) for the P30 Pro makes a direct comparison difficult. The K20 Pro’s brightness is a tangible benefit for users frequently exposed to sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised with capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The P30 Pro’s reputation centers around its low-light photography capabilities, likely stemming from a larger main sensor and sophisticated image processing. However, without specific aperture and sensor size details for either device, a definitive camera comparison is challenging. The focus should be on real-world image samples, as software processing plays a significant role. Ignoring the typical 2MP macro/depth sensors found on both devices, the primary camera performance will dictate the user experience.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi K20 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7nm) utilizes a tri-cluster architecture – 1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485, 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485, and 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 – designed for efficient task allocation. The Huawei P30 Pro New Edition’s Kirin 980 (7nm) employs a different approach with 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76, 2x1.92 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both are 7nm chips, the Snapdragon 855 generally demonstrates superior GPU performance, making the K20 Pro the better choice for mobile gamers. Thermal management, however, is an unknown factor without dedicated testing data.
Battery Life
The Redmi K20 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 103 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The P30 Pro New Edition counters with significantly faster 40W wired charging (70% in 30 minutes) and the addition of 15W wireless and reverse wireless charging. While the P30 Pro’s charging speed is a clear advantage for users who frequently need to top up quickly, the K20 Pro’s longer endurance means fewer charging cycles are required overall. The K20 Pro’s 27W QC4 charging is respectable, but doesn’t match the P30 Pro’s speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro if you prioritize raw processing power for gaming and demanding applications, and value exceptional battery life. It’s the ideal choice for users who want a flagship-level experience without the flagship price tag. Buy the Huawei P30 Pro New Edition if you prioritize faster charging speeds and a more established camera system, and are willing to accept slightly less battery endurance and potentially limited software access due to ongoing geopolitical factors.