Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro vs. Google Pixel 4 XL: A Battle of Endurance and Imaging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and value, the Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro is the clear winner. Its 103-hour endurance rating dwarfs the Pixel 4 XL’s 73 hours, and it offers comparable performance for a significantly lower price. However, the Pixel 4 XL’s superior camera software and tighter integration with Google services make it a compelling option for photography enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro | Google Pixel 4 XL |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, May 28. Released 2019, June 01 | 2019, October 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2019, October 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 156.7 x 74.3 x 8.8 mm (6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.2 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1440 x 3040 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~537 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 98.0 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10 | P-OLED, 90Hz, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, MIUI 12 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom |
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.4, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1.22µm, no AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (China only) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 27W wired, QC4 | 18W wired, PD2.0 Wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Carbon black, Flame red, Glacier blue, Summer Honey, Pearl White | Clearly White, Just Black, Oh So Orange |
| Models | M1903F11I | G020P, G020, GA01181-US, GA01182-US, GA01180-US |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 180 EUR |
| SAR | 1.03 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) | - |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 364.52 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 274.99 |
| RENEWED | - | $ 149.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.9dB / Crosstalk -94.2dB | Noise -93.9 / Crosstalk -94.1 |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 103h | Endurance rating 73h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 71dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 84dB | Voice 80dB / Noise 78dB / Ring 88dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 368846 (v7), 437823 (v8) GeekBench: 10684 (v4.4), 2732 (v5.1) GFXBench: 36fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 323305 (v7), 403267 (v8) GeekBench: 10171 (v4.4), 2267 (v5.1) GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (103h endurance)
- Faster 27W charging with QC4
- Significantly lower price point
- Software experience may be less refined
- Camera performance likely lags behind Pixel 4 XL
Google Pixel 4 XL
- Superior camera software and image quality
- Clean and optimized Android experience
- Seamless integration with Google services
- Poor battery life (73h endurance)
- Slower 18W charging
- Higher price
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset, but their displays differ significantly. The Redmi K20 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 643 nits, offering a vibrant viewing experience. While the Pixel 4 XL’s brightness isn’t specified, its OLED panel likely delivers excellent contrast, though the K20 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a similar level of black reproduction. The lack of high refresh rate panels on either device is a notable omission by today’s standards, but both offer smooth visuals for everyday tasks. The K20 Pro’s larger size may appeal to media consumers, while the Pixel 4 XL’s potentially more color-accurate display benefits photo editing.
Camera Comparison
While both phones feature capable photo and video capabilities, the Pixel 4 XL distinguishes itself through Google’s renowned computational photography. The Pixel 4 XL leverages advanced algorithms for HDR+, Night Sight, and portrait mode, consistently delivering excellent image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The K20 Pro’s camera hardware is less detailed in the provided data, but it likely relies more on hardware specifications. The Pixel 4 XL’s software processing is the key differentiator, offering a more refined and consistent experience. The absence of detailed sensor information for the K20 Pro makes a direct hardware comparison difficult.
Performance
Both the Redmi K20 Pro and Pixel 4 XL are powered by the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) chipset, featuring an Octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485). This means raw processing power is virtually identical. However, thermal management and software optimization can influence sustained performance. The Pixel 4 XL’s software is known for its efficiency, but the K20 Pro’s larger chassis might offer better heat dissipation during prolonged gaming sessions. RAM configurations are not specified for the Pixel 4 XL beyond the listed 6GB options, while the K20 Pro’s RAM is also unspecified, but both should handle multitasking effectively.
Battery Life
The most significant difference lies in battery endurance. The Redmi K20 Pro achieves an impressive 103-hour endurance rating, thanks to its larger battery capacity (unspecified in the data, but likely larger than the Pixel 4 XL’s) and efficient power management. The Pixel 4 XL, with a 73-hour endurance rating, falls considerably short. The K20 Pro also supports 27W wired charging with QC4, enabling faster top-ups compared to the Pixel 4 XL’s 18W wired charging with PD2.0 and wireless charging. This translates to significantly less downtime for the K20 Pro, making it ideal for users who rely heavily on their smartphones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro if you need exceptional battery life, fast charging (27W QC4), and don't mind a less polished software experience. It’s ideal for power users, gamers, and those who frequently travel. Buy the Google Pixel 4 XL if you prioritize camera quality, seamless software updates, and a clean Android experience. It’s best suited for photography lovers and users deeply invested in the Google ecosystem.