The tablet market is heating up, with options ranging from ultra-premium to budget-friendly. The Xiaomi Redmi K Pad and Honor Pad 8 represent distinct approaches: the K Pad prioritizes raw processing power with its cutting-edge Dimensity 9400+, while the Honor Pad 8 focuses on a balanced experience with a respectable display and efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right tablet for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users demanding peak performance for gaming or demanding applications, the Xiaomi Redmi K Pad is the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 9400+ chipset and faster charging. However, the Honor Pad 8 provides a solid, reliable experience for everyday tasks and media consumption, making it a viable option for those prioritizing efficiency and a balanced feature set.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | - | N/A |
| EDGE | N/A | No |
| GPRS | N/A | No |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 26 | 2022, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 26 | Available. Released 2022, July 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 205.1 x 132 x 6.5 mm (8.07 x 5.20 x 0.26 in) | 278.5 x 174.1 x 6.9 mm (10.96 x 6.85 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 326 g (11.50 oz) | 520 g (1.15 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1880 x 3008 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~194 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.8 inches, 224.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.0 inches, 409.9 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 68B colors, 165Hz, HDR Vivid, Dolby Vision, 700 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 350 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.12μm, PDAF | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/4" 1.12μm | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers (8 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, LHDC 5 | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | 1x USB Type-C 3.2, 1x USB Type-C 2.0, Display Port 1.4, accessory connector | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+
18W reverse wired
Bypass charging | 22.5W wired |
| Type | 7500 mAh | Li-Po 7250 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Purple | Dark Blue, Gold, Mint |
| Models | - | HEY-W09 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1468:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-22.7 LUFS (Excellent)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 279242 (v9)
GeekBench: 1545 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.3fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
- Exceptional performance with the Dimensity 9400+ chipset
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with multiple protocols
- 18W reverse wired charging for topping up other devices
- Display specifications currently unknown
- Potential for higher price compared to the Honor Pad 8
Honor Pad 8
- Respectable display with 392 nits brightness and 1468:1 contrast
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 processor for everyday tasks
- More affordable price point
- Significantly slower 22.5W charging
- Limited performance for demanding applications
Display Comparison
The Honor Pad 8 boasts a measured peak brightness of 392 nits and a 1468:1 contrast ratio, providing a visually pleasing experience for media consumption. However, the Redmi K Pad’s display specifications are currently unavailable, leaving a gap in direct comparison. Given the K Pad’s focus on performance, it’s likely to prioritize refresh rate over absolute color accuracy. The Honor Pad 8’s contrast ratio, while respectable, isn’t exceptional, but it’s a known quantity, offering predictable image quality. Without knowing the panel technology used in the Redmi K Pad (e.g., IPS, LCD, or OLED), it’s difficult to assess its color gamut coverage or viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Neither tablet is positioned as a photography powerhouse, and detailed camera specifications are lacking. Given the market segment, it’s reasonable to assume both feature modest camera setups primarily intended for video calls and casual snapshots. Without sensor size or aperture information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. The focus should be on video call quality, which will likely be similar given both tablets’ target audience.
Performance
The performance disparity is stark. The Xiaomi Redmi K Pad’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3nm) is a flagship-level chipset featuring a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.73 GHz, alongside three Cortex-X4 cores at 3.3 GHz and four Cortex-A720 efficiency cores. This configuration is designed for sustained peak performance. In contrast, the Honor Pad 8 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm), an octa-core processor with four Kryo 265 Gold cores at 2.4 GHz and four Kryo 265 Silver cores at 1.9 GHz. The 3nm process node of the Dimensity 9400+ offers significantly improved power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 6nm Snapdragon 680, translating to less throttling during intensive tasks. The Redmi K Pad will demonstrably outperform the Honor Pad 8 in gaming, video editing, and any application leveraging multi-core processing.
Battery Life
The Redmi K Pad’s 67W wired charging with PD3.0, QC3+, and 18W reverse wired charging is a significant advantage. This allows for incredibly fast charging times, minimizing downtime. The Honor Pad 8’s 22.5W charging is considerably slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the Redmi K Pad mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Redmi K Pad’s bypass charging feature is also a notable benefit, allowing the tablet to be powered directly from the charger without drawing from the battery, further extending battery lifespan during prolonged use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K Pad if you need a tablet capable of handling demanding games, video editing, or multitasking without slowdowns. Its 67W charging is also a boon for power users. Buy the Honor Pad 8 if you prefer a tablet for casual use – browsing, streaming, and light productivity – and value a more efficient processor and a well-calibrated display for comfortable viewing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 9400+ in the Redmi K Pad get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 9400+'s 3nm process node is designed for improved thermal efficiency. While some heat generation is inevitable during demanding tasks, it should be significantly better managed than older, larger-node chipsets. Xiaomi likely incorporates thermal management solutions to further mitigate heat buildup, but independent testing will be needed to confirm sustained performance under load.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 680 in the Honor Pad 8 powerful enough for multitasking with several apps open?
The Snapdragon 680 is a capable processor for everyday multitasking, handling several apps simultaneously without significant slowdowns. However, it will struggle with very demanding applications or running numerous resource-intensive apps concurrently. It's best suited for light to moderate multitasking scenarios.
❓ Does the Redmi K Pad support fast charging with non-Xiaomi chargers?
The Redmi K Pad supports PD3.0 and QC3+ fast charging protocols, meaning it should be compatible with many third-party chargers that adhere to these standards. However, to ensure optimal charging speeds and safety, it's recommended to use a charger that specifically supports these protocols and delivers the appropriate voltage and amperage.
