Xiaomi's Redmi series has long been a favorite for budget-conscious smartphone users. The Redmi 3s Prime and Redmi Note 3 were popular contenders, but which one offered the better value? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their features to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 3 edges out the 3s Prime thanks to its superior Snapdragon 650 chipset, slightly better battery life, and impressive display contrast. While both offer excellent value, the Note 3 provides a more refined and powerful experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - India | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 3, 5, 40 - India | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 - Special edition (Taiwan) |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2016, August. Released 2016, August | 2016, January 14. Released 2016, March 03 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 139.3 x 69.6 x 8.5 mm (5.48 x 2.74 x 0.33 in) | 150 x 76 x 8.7 mm (5.91 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 144 g (5.08 oz) | 164 g (5.78 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~71.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 82.6 cm2 (~72.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 | Hexa-core (4x1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 & 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A72) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8937 Snapdragon 430 (28 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8956 Snapdragon 650 |
| GPU | Adreno 505 | Adreno 510 |
| OS | Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow), MIUI 9.2 | Android 5.1.1 (Lollipop), upgradable to 6.0.1 (Marshmallow), MIUI 9.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM (Standard version), 32GB 3GB RAM (High/Special version) |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 4.5 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, PDAF | 16 MP, f/2.0, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP, LE | 4.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Stereo FM radio, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4100 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4050 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gold, Dark Gray, Silver | Silver, Gray, Gold |
| Models | - | 2015116, 2015161 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.49 W/kg (head) 0.50 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.62 W/kg (head) 0.43 W/kg (body) | 0.56 W/kg (head) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -96.0dB / Crosstalk -95.6dB |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 85h
| Endurance rating 93h |
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 953:1 (nominal), 2.249 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 66dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 75dB |
| Performance |
GFXBench: 4.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Basemark OS II 2.0: 1426Basemark X: 14717 |
Xiaomi Redmi 3s Prime
- Affordable
- Decent battery life
- Compact size
- Less powerful processor
- Average display
- Older chipset
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
- Better performance
- Superior display
- Slightly longer battery life
- Premium feel
- Slightly larger size
- Charging speed could be faster
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 3 boasts a significantly better display, particularly in sunlight. Its contrast ratio of 953:1 (nominal) and 2.249 (sunlight) provides vibrant colors and excellent visibility, surpassing the 3s Prime's display which lacked specific contrast ratio data but was generally considered adequate. Both phones feature a 5.5-inch display, but the Note 3's quality is noticeably superior.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a standard camera setup for their time. While specific camera specs are missing, reviews generally indicated the Note 3 produced slightly better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, due to the more powerful processor assisting image processing. Video recording capabilities were comparable.
Performance
The Redmi Note 3's Snapdragon 650 chipset is a clear winner here. Its hexa-core processor (4x1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 & 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A72) offers a substantial performance boost over the 3s Prime's Octa-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 Snapdragon 430. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance on the Note 3.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life, with the Redmi Note 3 holding a slight advantage with an endurance rating of 93h compared to the 3s Prime's 85h. Both should easily last a full day of moderate use.
Buying Guide
The Redmi 3s Prime is a solid choice for users prioritizing affordability and basic functionality. The Redmi Note 3 is ideal for those seeking better performance, a brighter display, and a more premium feel without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Redmi Note 3 worth the extra money compared to the 3s Prime?
Yes, the Redmi Note 3's improved performance and display justify the slightly higher price. It offers a more premium and capable experience.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Redmi Note 3 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 650 chipset.