Xiaomi consistently delivers compelling options in the budget and mid-range smartphone space. The Redmi 20X and Poco X4 Pro 5G represent two distinct approaches to affordable 5G connectivity. The Redmi 20X focuses on a streamlined experience with a Mediatek Dimensity 700, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G aims for a more feature-rich package with a Snapdragon 695 and significantly faster charging. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right phone.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a potentially smoother software experience, the Poco X4 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its 67W charging capability dramatically reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a slight edge in sustained performance. However, the Redmi 20X remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | - | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Unspecified | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Blue, Green | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 130 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi 20X
- More affordable price point
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset for basic tasks
- Acceptable battery life
- Slow 18W charging
- Potentially lower performance compared to Snapdragon 695
- Limited feature set
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Potentially smoother performance for gaming and demanding apps
- Higher price compared to Redmi 20X
- Similar battery life despite faster charging
- Camera specs are unknown
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the price points, expect both to offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. The lack of LTPO technology suggests neither display will dynamically adjust refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). This suggests a focus on basic photography functionality. Without further information, it’s difficult to assess camera quality. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing tactic, as these sensors typically produce low-quality images. The primary sensor and image processing algorithms will be the key differentiators, but remain unknown based on the provided data.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) benefits from a more modern fabrication process compared to the Redmi 20X’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm). While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz core configuration, the Snapdragon 695 utilizes Kryo 660 Gold cores, generally offering better single-core performance than the Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 700. The 6nm process also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Redmi 20X will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the Poco X4 Pro 5G is likely to provide a smoother experience with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Redmi 20X is limited to 18W wired charging, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G boasts 67W wired charging with support for PD3.0 and QC3. This translates to a 70% charge in just 22 minutes and a full charge in 41 minutes for the Poco X4 Pro 5G – a significant advantage for users who value convenience and minimal downtime. The faster charging effectively mitigates any potential battery capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 20X if you need a functional, reliable 5G phone with a focus on affordability and aren't concerned with extremely fast charging. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prioritize rapid charging, potentially better sustained performance for gaming, and a more comprehensive feature set, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 695's 6nm process and Qualcomm's thermal management technologies generally provide good thermal efficiency. While some throttling is possible during extended, graphically intensive gaming, it's likely to be less pronounced than with the Redmi 20X's Dimensity 700 due to the more efficient manufacturing process.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Redmi 20X slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
Yes, 18W charging is considerably slower than the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G. Expect a full charge to take well over two hours, which may be inconvenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ How does the Dimensity 700 compare to the Snapdragon 695 for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For everyday tasks, both chipsets will provide a smooth and responsive experience. The Snapdragon 695 has a slight edge in processing power, but the difference will be minimal for basic usage. You likely won't notice a significant difference in performance for typical daily activities.
❓ Does either phone support expandable storage via microSD card?
This information is not provided in the context data. However, given the target market of these phones, it's highly probable that at least one, if not both, offer microSD card support for expanding storage capacity.
