Google Pixel 6a vs Xiaomi Redmi 20X: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6a is the superior choice. While both phones offer comparable battery endurance (94h), the Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor chip provides significantly more processing power and a smoother user experience, justifying its slightly higher price. The Redmi 20X remains a viable option for those prioritizing extreme value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi 20X | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | - | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | - | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Unspecified | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Blue, Green | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | - | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 130 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Xiaomi Redmi 20X
- Significantly faster processor with Google Tensor
- Superior camera performance and image processing
- PD3.0 charging support for faster charging with compatible adapters
- Potentially higher price point
- No expandable storage
Google Pixel 6a
- More affordable price
- Decent battery life
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Slower processor and less responsive user experience
- Less capable camera system
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 876 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Redmi 20X. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. While both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the Pixel 6a’s OLED panel likely delivers deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The Redmi 20X’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a more standard LCD panel, potentially impacting color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s camera system benefits from Google’s renowned computational photography algorithms. While specific sensor details are missing for both phones, the Pixel 6a’s image processing excels in dynamic range, detail preservation, and low-light performance. The Redmi 20X likely relies more on hardware limitations, potentially resulting in less refined images. The absence of details regarding OIS or advanced features on the Redmi 20X further suggests a less sophisticated camera experience. Ignoring the typical 2MP macro lens found on many budget phones, the Pixel 6a’s overall image quality is expected to be superior.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) is a significant step up from the Redmi 20X’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Tensor’s octa-core configuration, featuring 2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 cores, provides substantially more processing power than the Dimensity 700’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved performance in demanding games. The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the Redmi 20X is adequate for everyday tasks, the Pixel 6a offers a more responsive and future-proof experience.
Battery Life
Both the Pixel 6a and Redmi 20X achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Pixel 6a’s Tensor chip, despite its higher performance, manages to maintain this endurance thanks to its efficient 5nm process. Both phones support 18W wired charging, but the Pixel 6a adds support for PD3.0, potentially allowing for faster charging with compatible chargers. A full 0-100% charge time is likely similar for both, around 1.5-2 hours, but the Pixel 6a’s PD3.0 support offers more flexibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 20X if you need a dependable daily driver with acceptable performance for basic tasks and prioritize affordability above all else. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you value a faster processor for demanding apps, superior camera capabilities powered by Google’s image processing, and a cleaner, more streamlined software experience.