Xiaomi Redmi 15C vs Samsung Galaxy A14: Which Budget Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi 15C emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Galaxy A14’s Helio G80, and even competes well with the Exynos 850 variant. Coupled with its exceptional 62-hour battery life, the Redmi 15C offers superior value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi 15C | Samsung Galaxy A14 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 18 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 18 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 173.2 x 81.1 x 8.2 mm (6.82 x 3.19 x 0.32 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 211 g (7.44 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~254 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 114.9 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 810 nits (HBM) | PLS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 28 min 10W reverse wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Mint Green, Dusk Purple | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | 2508CRN2BC, 2508CRN2BG, 25062RN2DE | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | € 131.09 | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 62:06h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Redmi 15C
- Superior performance with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Exceptional battery life (62+ hours)
- Faster 33W charging with PD support
- Brand recognition isn't as strong as Samsung
- Camera performance likely average for the price range
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Familiar Samsung user interface
- Strong brand reputation
- Choice of chipset (Helio G80 or Exynos 850)
- Slower performance compared to the Redmi 15C
- Slower 15W charging
- Likely shorter battery life
Display Comparison
Neither device is a display standout. The context data lacks specifics on panel technology or resolution, but given the price bracket, both likely utilize LCD panels. The key difference lies in the processing power driving them. The Redmi 15C’s more capable chipset will likely translate to smoother scrolling and faster app loading, even if the panels themselves are similar. We anticipate both will have adequate, but not exceptional, color accuracy and brightness for outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature basic camera setups. The Redmi 15C’s image processing will likely focus on delivering vibrant, social media-ready photos, while Samsung’s processing tends towards more natural colors. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A14 is largely a marketing gimmick and unlikely to deliver significant image quality improvements. Sensor size and aperture are critical, but absent from the data.
Performance
The Redmi 15C’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) is the clear winner here. Its Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, offer significantly more processing power than the Galaxy A14’s Helio G80 (12nm) with its 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained tasks. The Galaxy A14’s Exynos 850 (8nm) version closes the gap, but still lags behind the Dimensity 6300 in raw performance. The Redmi 15C will handle multitasking and demanding apps more smoothly.
Battery Life
The Redmi 15C dominates in battery endurance with a reported 62:06h of usage. This is a substantial lead over what we’d expect from the Galaxy A14, which likely falls in the 40-50 hour range based on its 15W charging and typical battery capacity for this class. The Redmi 15C’s 33W charging with PD support is also a significant advantage, allowing for a 50% charge in just 28 minutes, compared to the A14’s slower 15W charging. The 10W reverse wired charging on the Redmi 15C is a bonus for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 15C if you prioritize performance for the price and exceptional battery life. It’s ideal for users who stream videos, play casual games, and need a phone that can easily last a full day (or more) on a single charge. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A14 if you strongly prefer the Samsung ecosystem, value brand recognition, and are willing to trade some performance for a familiar user experience.