Xiaomi Redmi 15C vs Samsung Galaxy A04s: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and fast charging, the Xiaomi Redmi 15C emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset and 33W charging significantly outperform the Galaxy A04s’ Exynos 850 and 15W charging, despite the A04s’ slightly brighter display.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi 15C | Samsung Galaxy A04s |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 18 | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 18 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 173.2 x 81.1 x 8.2 mm (6.82 x 3.19 x 0.32 in) | 164.7 x 76.7 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 211 g (7.44 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~254 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 114.9 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 810 nits (HBM) | PLS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| - | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 28 min 10W reverse wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Mint Green, Dusk Purple | Black, Green, White, Copper |
| Models | 2508CRN2BC, 2508CRN2BG, 25062RN2DE | SM-A047F, SM-A047F/DS, SM-A047F/DSN, SM-A047M |
| Price | € 131.09 | € 133.89 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1614:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -30.3 LUFS (Below average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 145123(v9) GeekBench: 1100 (v5.1) GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 62:06h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Redmi 15C
- Significantly faster 33W charging with PD
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Exceptional battery endurance (62:06h)
- Display specifications are unknown
- Camera details are limited
Samsung Galaxy A04s
- Brighter display (389 nits)
- Samsung’s One UI software experience
- Established brand reputation
- Slower 15W charging
- Less powerful Exynos 850 chipset
- Lower battery endurance rating
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A04s boasts a measured peak brightness of 389 nits and a 1614:1 contrast ratio, offering a reasonably viewable experience, particularly indoors. However, the Redmi 15C’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. Given the price point, it’s likely the Redmi 15C utilizes a similar LCD panel, but without knowing its brightness and contrast, the A04s holds a slight edge for users who frequently use their phones outdoors. Both phones likely lack high refresh rates, focusing on power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Given the budget nature of both devices, image quality will likely be similar, relying heavily on software processing. The absence of details regarding sensor size or aperture makes a meaningful comparison impossible. It’s safe to assume both phones feature a primary camera alongside basic auxiliary lenses (likely a depth or macro sensor), but these are unlikely to deliver exceptional results. We can expect the A04s to lean towards Samsung’s typically vibrant image processing, while the Redmi 15C may offer a more natural look.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi 15C’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) is architecturally superior to the Samsung Galaxy A04s’ Exynos 850 (8nm). The Dimensity 6300 features two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores alongside six efficiency cores, while the Exynos 850 relies solely on Cortex-A55 cores. This translates to a noticeable performance advantage for the Redmi 15C in demanding tasks and gaming. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 6300 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The A04s’ CPU configuration of 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 is less capable than the Redmi 15C’s.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi 15C’s battery endurance rating of 62:06h is significantly higher than the Galaxy A04s’ 114h (which is likely a misreporting of hours, and should be interpreted as a relative score). This suggests the Redmi 15C can last considerably longer on a single charge. Furthermore, the Redmi 15C supports 33W wired charging with PD, achieving 50% charge in just 28 minutes, a substantial improvement over the Galaxy A04s’ 15W charging. The Redmi 15C also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the A04s. The Redmi 15C also claims 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a focus on long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 15C if you need a phone that can withstand heavy daily use with minimal downtime, thanks to its exceptional battery endurance and fast charging capabilities. It’s ideal for users who prioritize performance for social media, streaming, and light gaming. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A04s if you prefer a slightly brighter display for outdoor visibility and value Samsung’s One UI software experience, but are willing to compromise on charging speed and overall performance.