Xiaomi Redmi 15C vs Motorola Moto G23: Which Budget Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi 15C emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a noticeable performance advantage and superior power efficiency, translating to a remarkable 62-hour battery endurance. While the Moto G23 is a capable device, it can't match the Redmi 15C's overall package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi 15C | Motorola Moto G23 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe, AP/MEA |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - AP/MEA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 18 | 2023, January 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 18 | Available. Released 2023, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 173.2 x 81.1 x 8.2 mm (6.82 x 3.19 x 0.32 in) | 162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 211 g (7.44 oz) | 184.3 g (6.49 oz) |
| - | Water-resistant design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Panda glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~254 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 114.9 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 810 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 28 min 10W reverse wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Mint Green, Dusk Purple | Matte Charcoal, Pearl White, Steel Blue |
| Models | 2508CRN2BC, 2508CRN2BG, 25062RN2DE | XT2333-1 |
| Price | € 131.09 | About 80 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 62:06h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Redmi 15C
- Superior chipset performance with the Dimensity 6300
- Exceptional battery life (62h+ endurance)
- Faster 33W charging with PD and reverse charging
- Display specifications are unknown
- Camera details are limited
Motorola Moto G23
- Simpler, potentially cleaner software experience (typical of Motorola)
- Established Helio G85 platform is reliable for basic tasks
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Dimensity 6300
- Likely shorter battery life
- Slower charging speed
Display Comparison
Neither device specifies display details beyond size, leaving brightness and color accuracy as unknowns. However, the chipset difference hints at potential display capabilities. The Redmi 15C’s Dimensity 6300 is capable of driving higher resolution and refresh rate panels, suggesting a potentially sharper and smoother visual experience, though this isn't confirmed. The Moto G23’s Helio G85 is adequate for basic display tasks but may struggle with more demanding visuals.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP) plays a crucial role. The Dimensity 6300 generally offers more advanced ISP capabilities, potentially resulting in better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range in the Redmi 15C. The Moto G23’s Helio G85 ISP is adequate for basic photography, but may struggle in low-light conditions or with complex scenes. The absence of OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi 15C’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz – compared to the Moto G23’s Helio G85 (12nm) with its Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 6300 is significantly more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Redmi 15C. The Helio G85, while capable, is an older design and will likely exhibit more throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Redmi 15C truly shines in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 62 hours and 6 minutes of usage. This is likely due to the efficient 6nm Dimensity 6300 chipset. While the Moto G23’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its less efficient Helio G85 chipset will likely result in shorter battery life. The Redmi 15C also supports 33W wired charging with PD, achieving a 50% charge in just 28 minutes, while the Moto G23 is limited to 30W. The Redmi 15C also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Moto G23.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 15C if you prioritize long battery life, smoother multitasking, and a more future-proof chipset for handling demanding apps. It’s ideal for users who stream videos, browse the web extensively, or need a phone that can last through a full day (and then some) on a single charge. Buy the Motorola Moto G23 if you prefer a simpler, more streamlined software experience and are less concerned with raw processing power or extended battery life. It’s a solid choice for basic communication and light usage.