The Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G and Samsung Galaxy A24 4G represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone space. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, they diverge in key areas like chipset architecture and display technology, making the choice less straightforward than it appears. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G emerges as the stronger contender. Its newer Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, fabricated on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a performance advantage and potentially better thermal management. The significantly brighter 1012 nit display also enhances usability in outdoor conditions, justifying the slight price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 01 | 2023, April 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 01 | Available. Released 2023, May 05 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, glass back or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 171.6 x 79.5 x 8 mm (6.76 x 3.13 x 0.31 in) | 162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3 mm (6.38 x 3.06 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~254 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 114.9 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD | 25W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Blue, Mint Green, Midnight Gray, Twilight Orange | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red |
| Models | 25078RA3EA, 25078RA3EL | SM-A245F, SM-A245F/DS, SM-A245F/DSN, SM-A245M, SM-A245M/DS, SM-A245N |
| Price | $ 119.50 / £ 89.00 / € 99.00 | About 150 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.41 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable Mediatek Helio G81 performance for basic tasks
- Older 12nm chipset architecture
- Likely dimmer display
- Potentially less efficient power consumption
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
- More efficient 6nm Helio G99 chipset
- Significantly brighter 1012 nit display
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Potentially higher price point
- May not offer a dramatically different experience for very basic users
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G boasts a substantial advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1012 nits. This is a significant leap over what we'd expect from the Redmi 15C, making the A24 far more usable under direct sunlight. While the Redmi 15C's panel specifics are unknown, it's likely to be considerably dimmer. The A24's brightness isn't just about visibility; it also impacts color vibrancy and overall image clarity. We can assume both use LCD panels given the price bracket, but the A24's superior brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by limited data. However, the market positioning suggests the Galaxy A24 likely features a more sophisticated image processing pipeline. While both phones likely include a primary camera, the A24's potential for better dynamic range and low-light performance is higher due to the more modern ISP within the Helio G99. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the A24, if present (market research needed to confirm), would further enhance image quality, particularly in video recording. We can safely assume both phones include lower-resolution auxiliary cameras (depth or macro) that offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G utilizes the Mediatek Helio G99, built on a 6nm process, while the Redmi 15C 4G features the older Helio G81 (12nm). This process node difference is crucial; 6nm allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, translating to better performance and reduced heat generation. The A24's CPU, with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, also offers a slight clock speed advantage over the Redmi 15C's 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. While both are octa-core designs, the A76 architecture is more modern and efficient. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking on the A24.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G has an endurance rating of 141 hours, indicating solid battery life. While the Redmi 15C's battery capacity is unknown, the A24's more efficient Helio G99 chipset and optimized software likely contribute to comparable or even superior real-world usage. The Redmi 15C compensates with faster 33W wired charging, potentially offering quicker top-ups. However, the A24's 25W charging is still respectable and, combined with its efficiency, should provide sufficient power for a full day of moderate use. The faster charging of the Redmi 15C will be more noticeable for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G if you prioritize fast charging (33W) and are seeking the absolute lowest price point for basic smartphone functionality. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G if you value a brighter, more vibrant display, improved performance for multitasking and gaming, and a more modern chipset architecture that promises better long-term software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Helio G99 in the Galaxy A24 4G get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the G81 in the Redmi 15C?
The Helio G99's 6nm process should result in lower heat generation compared to the G81's 12nm process, even under sustained load. While both phones are budget devices and may exhibit some throttling, the A24 is likely to maintain higher sustained performance for longer periods due to its improved thermal efficiency.
❓ Is the 25W charging on the Galaxy A24 4G significantly slower than the 33W charging on the Redmi 15C in real-world use?
While 33W is theoretically faster, the difference in charging speed may not be dramatic in practice. The A24's more efficient chipset and battery management could mean it reaches a usable charge level relatively quickly, even with the lower wattage. The Redmi 15C will likely offer a faster 0-100% charge time, but the A24's overall efficiency might minimize the perceived difference.
❓ How does the display on the Galaxy A24 4G perform outdoors in bright sunlight?
The Galaxy A24 4G's 1012 nit peak brightness makes it exceptionally well-suited for outdoor use. The screen remains easily visible even under direct sunlight, a significant advantage over the Redmi 15C, which likely has a considerably dimmer display.
