Xiaomi Redmi 15 vs. Samsung Galaxy A14: Which Budget Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi 15 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 chipset, built on a 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Galaxy A14’s Helio G80 (and even the Exynos 850 variant), coupled with significantly faster 33W charging and impressive 67:03h battery endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi 15 | Samsung Galaxy A14 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 71 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 01 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 01 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 169.5 x 80.5 x 8.4 mm (6.67 x 3.17 x 0.33 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 217 g (7.65 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 6 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~374 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 116.9 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, 600 nits (typ), 700 nits (HBM), 850 nits (peak) | PLS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2.2 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.88" 0.61μm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD 2.0, PPS, QC3 18W reverse wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Titan Gray, Ripple Green | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | 25057RN09E | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | € 159.00 / $ 219.99 / £ 179.00 | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 67:03h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class D (45 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Redmi 15
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
- Faster 33W charging with multiple protocols
- Exceptional battery life (67:03h endurance)
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- Camera performance may not match flagship devices
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Samsung’s One UI software is user-friendly
- Potentially larger display size
- Brand recognition and support
- Slower performance with Helio G80/Exynos 850
- Slow 15W charging
- Less efficient battery usage
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, detailed specs are missing. The Galaxy A14’s larger screen size (typically 6.6 inches vs. Redmi 15’s likely 6.5-6.6 inches) may appeal to media consumers. Without knowing the peak brightness or color gamut coverage, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but Samsung generally offers slightly better color calibration in this segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to assess without detailed sensor information. However, given the market segment, both phones likely feature a primary sensor around 13-50MP. The Redmi 15’s image processing pipeline, while not flagship-level, is generally more refined than Samsung’s budget offerings. The Galaxy A14’s inclusion of a 2MP macro lens is largely a marketing gimmick, offering minimal practical benefit. The Redmi 15’s superior processing power may also contribute to better low-light performance.
Performance
The Redmi 15’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6nm) is the clear performance leader. Its Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.3 GHz, offer a substantial uplift over the Galaxy A14’s Helio G80’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 6nm fabrication process also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The Exynos 850 variant of the A14, while built on an 8nm process, still lags behind the Snapdragon in CPU and GPU performance. The Redmi 15 will handle multitasking and gaming more smoothly.
Battery Life
The Redmi 15 dominates in battery endurance with a tested 67:03h of usage. While the Galaxy A14’s battery capacity is likely comparable (around 5000mAh), the Redmi 15’s more efficient chipset and 33W charging (with PD 2.0, PPS, and QC3 support) provide a significant advantage. The A14’s 15W charging feels slow by comparison, taking considerably longer to reach a full charge. The Redmi 15 also offers 18W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the A14.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 15 if you prioritize performance for everyday tasks and light gaming, and value fast charging and exceptional battery life. You’ll benefit from a more responsive experience and less time tethered to a wall charger. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A14 if you strongly prefer Samsung’s One UI software, or if you find a significantly discounted version with the Exynos 850 chipset and are willing to trade some performance for brand loyalty.