Xiaomi Redmi 14R vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and rapid charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the clear winner. Its 68W charging and impressive 10:28h active use battery score outweigh the Redmi 14R’s slightly newer chipset. However, the Redmi 14R offers a competitive package for those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi 14R | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 14 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 171.9 x 77.8 x 8.2 mm (6.77 x 3.06 x 0.32 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205.4 / 208.5 / 212.4 g (7.23 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF 2 MP Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, PD | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5160 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Sage Green, Starry Blue, Purple | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | - | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Xiaomi Redmi 14R
- Potentially better power efficiency due to 4nm process
- Modern Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset
- Likely more affordable price point
- Significantly slower 18W charging
- Limited battery life information
- Likely lower display brightness
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- 68W fast charging (50% in 15 min)
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- 6nm process may be less power efficient
- Potentially higher price
- Dimensity 7030 may not offer a huge performance leap
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Redmi 14R (brightness data unavailable). While the Redmi 14R’s panel specifics are unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness suggests a superior viewing experience in bright conditions. The Edge 40 Neo’s display technology is likely to be OLED, offering better contrast and color accuracy than the Redmi 14R’s likely LCD panel. Bezels are expected to be comparable, given both phones target a similar price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the Redmi 14R are limited. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera system is expected to be more versatile, with a focus on photo and video quality. While sensor sizes and apertures are unknown for both, the Edge 40 Neo likely benefits from Motorola’s image processing algorithms. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Edge 40 Neo would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording, a feature likely absent on the Redmi 14R. Avoid placing too much weight on the presence of 2MP macro lenses on either device, as their image quality is typically subpar.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) and its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores offer a slight CPU clock speed advantage over the Redmi 14R’s Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. The 4nm process of the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 *should* translate to better power efficiency, but the Dimensity 7030’s more powerful cores may provide a noticeable edge in demanding tasks. The Redmi 14R’s newer architecture could offer improved AI processing capabilities. However, without detailed GPU benchmarks, it’s difficult to definitively declare a performance winner. Thermal management will likely be similar, as both phones are designed for mid-range workloads.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery department. Its active use score of 10:28h and endurance rating of 80h demonstrate exceptional longevity. The 68W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Redmi 14R’s 18W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly more time to reach a full charge. While the Redmi 14R’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s superior charging speed and endurance make it the more convenient option for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 14R if you need a dependable daily driver with a modern chipset and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who prioritize value and don’t heavily rely on power-intensive applications. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a phone that can quickly top up its battery and last a full day with moderate to heavy use. This is the better choice for travelers, commuters, or anyone who dislikes battery anxiety.