Xiaomi Redmi 11 vs Poco X4 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Xiaomi's Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid replenishment, the Poco X4 Pro 5G is the clear winner. Its 67W charging, capable of a full charge in just 41 minutes, significantly outperforms the Redmi 11’s 18W charging. However, the Redmi 11 remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget who don't mind slower charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi 11 | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | - | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Unspecified | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | - | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray; other colors | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 170 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi 11
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery life (119h endurance)
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Slow 18W charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Potentially more thermal throttling
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (full charge in 41 minutes)
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Higher price compared to the Redmi 11
- Battery life is comparable, not superior, despite faster charging
- Camera specs are largely unknown
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the price points, expect both to offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. The lack of high refresh rate panels on either device suggests a focus on power efficiency rather than visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). This suggests a similar level of camera performance, likely geared towards casual photography. Without further information, it’s difficult to determine a clear winner. The absence of details implies both rely heavily on software processing to enhance image quality. Expect both to struggle in low-light conditions without dedicated night modes.
Performance
The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) holds a clear architectural advantage over the Redmi 11’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 6nm process generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance. While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz core configuration, the Snapdragon 695 utilizes Kryo 660 Gold cores, which are typically more efficient than the Cortex-A76 cores found in the Dimensity 700. This suggests the Poco X4 Pro 5G will offer better sustained performance during demanding tasks like gaming. The Redmi 11's Dimensity 700 is still capable for everyday use, but may exhibit more throttling under prolonged load.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Redmi 11’s 18W wired charging is relatively slow, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, is a game-changer. The X4 Pro 5G can reach 70% charge in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, offering a significant convenience advantage. This charging speed effectively mitigates any potential battery life differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 11 if you need a dependable, affordable 5G phone for everyday tasks and prioritize a lower upfront cost. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prefer significantly faster charging speeds, potentially better sustained performance under load, and are willing to spend a bit more for those benefits. The X4 Pro 5G is ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their battery quickly.