Xiaomi dominates the budget smartphone space with a plethora of options. The Redmi 11 Prime and Poco X4 Pro 5G represent two compelling choices, both aiming to deliver 5G connectivity and a solid feature set without breaking the bank. However, they take different approaches – the Redmi 11 Prime focuses on efficiency with a Mediatek Helio G99, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G prioritizes faster charging and a Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a slightly more robust 5G experience, the Poco X4 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the Redmi 11 Prime’s 18W, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a more consistent 5G connection. However, the Redmi 11 Prime remains a strong contender for those seeking a balance of efficiency and affordability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 06 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 23 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Playful Green, Flashy Black, Peppy Purple | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | 22071219AI | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 160 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi 11 Prime
- Potentially better single-core CPU performance with Helio G99
- Power-efficient Mediatek chipset
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Significantly slower 18W charging
- Less robust 5G modem compared to Snapdragon
- Likely less advanced camera system
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support
- Integrated 5G modem for reliable connectivity
- Potentially better camera performance
- Slightly less efficient CPU architecture
- May be slightly more expensive
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, a common marketing term indicating a good, but not necessarily exceptional, display. Without specific brightness data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s larger display size (typically 6.67 inches vs the Redmi 11 Prime’s 6.59 inches) may offer a more immersive viewing experience. The lack of information on panel type (IPS vs AMOLED) and refresh rate limits a deeper analysis, but both likely target the 60Hz standard for this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific sensor details. Without knowing megapixel counts or sensor sizes, a direct comparison is challenging. However, Xiaomi typically equips its Poco line with slightly more advanced camera systems. The absence of information on Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) suggests neither phone features it, meaning low-light performance will rely heavily on software processing. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi 11 Prime’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) utilizes two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, paired with six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. The Poco X4 Pro 5G features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with two Kryo 660 Gold cores at 2.2 GHz and six Kryo 660 Silver cores at 1.7 GHz. While both CPUs have similar peak clock speeds, the architectural differences suggest the Helio G99 might offer slightly better single-core performance, while the Snapdragon 695 excels in 5G modem integration and potentially more efficient multi-core tasks. The Snapdragon 695’s integrated 5G modem is a key advantage for users in areas with 5G coverage.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Redmi 11 Prime’s 18W charging is relatively slow, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging is a game-changer. The Poco X4 Pro 5G can reach 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, offering significant convenience. The Redmi 11 Prime will take considerably longer to fully charge, making the Poco X4 Pro 5G the clear winner for users who value fast refueling.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 11 Prime if you need a dependable daily driver with a focus on power efficiency and are less concerned with blazing-fast charging. It’s ideal for users who prioritize long-term usability and don’t heavily rely on 5G. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prefer a phone that can quickly top up its battery, offering convenience for busy users, and want a more consistent 5G experience, even if it means slightly less battery optimization.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 695 is a capable chipset, it's not a flagship processor. Expect some thermal throttling during extended gaming, but Xiaomi's software optimizations and the phone's thermal design should mitigate excessive overheating. The Helio G99 in the Redmi 11 Prime may exhibit similar throttling behavior.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Poco X4 Pro 5G significantly better than on the Redmi 11 Prime?
Yes. The Poco X4 Pro 5G utilizes a dedicated 5G modem integrated into the Snapdragon 695, offering more reliable and consistent 5G connections. The Redmi 11 Prime’s 5G implementation may be less optimized, potentially resulting in slower speeds or dropped connections in areas with weaker 5G signals.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 18W charging on the Redmi 11 Prime?
The 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G is significantly faster. It can charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 41 minutes, while the Redmi 11 Prime’s 18W charging will likely take over two hours to achieve a full charge. This difference is crucial for users who need a quick power boost.
