Xiaomi Redmi 11 Prime 5G vs Note 11 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a brighter, more visible display, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is the clear winner. Its 67W charging capability and 746 nit peak brightness offer tangible benefits. However, the Redmi 11 Prime 5G remains a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers who don't need those premium features.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi 11 Prime 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 06 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 09 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Thunder Black, Chrome Silver, Meadow Green | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | - | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi 11 Prime 5G
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable 5G connectivity
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely less vibrant display
- Potentially weaker camera performance
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- 67W fast charging (50% in 15 min)
- Brighter 746 nit display
- Potentially better camera system
- Higher price tag
- May not offer a dramatically different experience for basic users
- Snapdragon 695 can still exhibit throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 746 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a common pain point for smartphone users. While both phones likely utilize LCD panels (given the price bracket), the Note 11 Pro 5G’s higher peak brightness translates to a more enjoyable viewing experience in direct sunlight. Contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal) for the Note 11 Pro 5G, suggesting a well-tuned panel, though this is a standard marketing claim. The Redmi 11 Prime 5G’s display specifications are not provided, implying a more standard brightness level, likely adequate for indoor use but less impressive outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, being the higher-tier model, likely benefits from a larger primary sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The absence of sensor size details prevents a definitive comparison, but the Note 11 Pro 5G’s price point suggests a more capable camera system.
Performance
The chipset choice is the core performance differentiator. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the Redmi 11 Prime 5G features the MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Snapdragon 695, built on a smaller 6nm process, generally offers better power efficiency and sustained performance compared to the 7nm Dimensity 700. While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz core configuration, the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores are architecturally more advanced than the Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 700. This translates to a slight edge in single-core performance and improved GPU capabilities for gaming. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is likely to handle graphically demanding games with slightly higher frame rates and less throttling.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 115 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing charging capabilities. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reach 50% charge in just 15 minutes and fully charge in 42 minutes, a significant advantage over the Redmi 11 Prime 5G’s slower 18W charging. While the 11 Prime 5G may offer comparable battery longevity, the convenience of rapid charging on the 11 Pro 5G is a substantial benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 11 Prime 5G if you need a reliable 5G smartphone with decent performance for everyday tasks and prioritize value above all else. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you prefer a significantly faster charging experience, a brighter and more vibrant display for outdoor use, and are willing to spend a bit more for those enhancements.