Xiaomi Redmi 11 Prime 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and faster charging, the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a slight edge in sustained performance, and the 25W charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the Redmi 11 Prime’s 18W.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi 11 Prime 5G | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 30, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 06 | 2022, August 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 09 | Available. Released 2022, September 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - USA 8 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - International |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Thunder Black, Chrome Silver, Meadow Green | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A236U, SM-A236U1, SM-A236B, SM-A236B/DS, SM-A236B/DSN, SM-A236E, SM-S236DL |
| Price | About 180 EUR | $ 84.44 / £ 129.00 / € 125.28 / ₹ 21,000 |
| SAR | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 138h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1328:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 318821 (v9) GeekBench: 1940 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi 11 Prime 5G
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset
- Solid all-around performance for everyday tasks
- Slower 18W charging
- Less efficient 7nm chipset
- Likely less refined software experience
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- Faster 25W charging
- More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Samsung’s established brand and software support
- Potentially higher price
- Similar camera specs to the Redmi 11 Prime
- No significant upgrade in display technology
Display Comparison
Both devices offer similar display experiences, with a 1328:1 contrast ratio. However, the Galaxy A23 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 508 nits, which will translate to better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Redmi 11 Prime 5G, for which brightness data is unavailable. While both likely utilize LCD panels, the A23’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor use. The lack of high refresh rate support on either device is a common compromise at this price point.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera setup, but detailed sensor information is missing. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Samsung’s image processing algorithms are generally known for producing vibrant, saturated images, while Xiaomi often aims for a more natural look. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests that low-light photography will be a challenge, relying heavily on software processing. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on both is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) benefits from a more modern fabrication process than the Xiaomi Redmi 11 Prime 5G’s Dimensity 700 (7nm). This 6nm process generally leads to improved power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance under load. While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz core configuration, the Snapdragon utilizes Kryo 660 Gold cores, which are architecturally more advanced than the Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 700. This translates to a slight advantage for the A23 5G in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 138 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G’s 25W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Redmi 11 Prime 5G’s 18W charging. This faster charging will allow users to replenish the battery more quickly, minimizing downtime. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging speed on the A23 5G provides a practical benefit, even if the overall battery life is similar.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 11 Prime 5G if you need a dependable daily driver with a focus on affordability and aren't heavily reliant on demanding applications. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G if you prefer a slightly more refined experience, benefit from faster charging speeds, and appreciate the Qualcomm chipset's potentially better long-term software support and thermal management.