Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro 5G vs vivo X50 Pro+: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user in 2024, the vivo X50 Pro+ emerges as the stronger choice. While the Redmi 10X Pro offered excellent value, the Snapdragon 865’s superior processing power and the X50 Pro+'s refined camera system provide a more well-rounded experience, justifying its higher original price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro 5G | vivo X50 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| EDGE | Class 10 | - |
| GPRS | Class 10 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 26 | 2020, June 01. Released 2020, July 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, June 06 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front, eco leather back or glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 158.5 x 73 x 8.8 mm (6.24 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 192.2 g (6.77 oz) |
| Water-repellent coating | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 820 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC5 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 11 | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Call records | Yes | - |
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Phonebook | 1000 entries, Photocall | - |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.1, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm |
| Single | 2 MP | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@960fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio; built-in antenna | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML | - |
| Games | Yes | - |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.1 | - |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS, Email | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 58% in 30 min | 44W wired, 62% in 30 min |
| Stand-by | Up to 160 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 2 h 30 min | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4520 mAh | 4350 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gold, Pink/Blue | Blue, Brown |
| Models | M2004J7BC | V2011A |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 630 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 93h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 621433 (v8) GeekBench: 3411 (v5.1) GFXBench: 43fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro 5G
- More affordable price point (originally)
- Efficient Dimensity 820 chipset for everyday tasks
- Competent 5G connectivity
- Less powerful processor compared to Snapdragon 865
- Likely less refined camera system
- Slower charging speed
vivo X50 Pro+
- More powerful Snapdragon 865 processor
- Superior camera system with advanced ISP
- Faster 44W wired charging
- Higher original price
- Snapdragon 865 can be prone to throttling under sustained load
- Potentially larger physical size
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels typical of AMOLED panels. However, detailed display specifications like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given vivo’s history with display technology, the X50 Pro+ likely benefits from a wider color gamut and potentially higher peak brightness, resulting in a more vibrant and visible screen in direct sunlight. The Redmi 10X Pro, while still offering a good viewing experience, likely prioritizes efficiency over absolute display fidelity.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X50 Pro+ was marketed heavily for its camera capabilities, and while specific sensor details are absent, its 'Photo / Video' designation suggests a more comprehensive and refined camera system. The Redmi 10X Pro, while likely capable, was positioned as a more value-oriented device, suggesting a less sophisticated camera setup. The Snapdragon 865’s image signal processor (ISP) is also more advanced, enabling better image processing and potentially superior low-light performance on the X50 Pro+. The absence of details on OIS and lens apertures makes a precise comparison difficult, but the X50 Pro+ likely features a more versatile and higher-quality camera system.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X50 Pro+’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the Redmi 10X Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 820 (7nm) with its 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to faster application loading times and smoother multitasking on the vivo. While the Dimensity 820 is a capable chip, the Snapdragon 865’s Adreno 650 GPU provides a significant advantage in graphics-intensive tasks like gaming. The Snapdragon 865’s 7nm+ process, while not a massive leap over the 7nm Dimensity 820, offers slightly improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 93 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, charging speeds differ. The vivo X50 Pro+’s 44W wired charging reaches 62% in 30 minutes, while the Redmi 10X Pro’s 33W charging achieves 58% in the same timeframe. This suggests the X50 Pro+ offers slightly faster charging, a convenience for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The similar endurance ratings suggest that despite the more powerful processor, the Snapdragon 865’s efficiency, combined with software optimizations, allows the X50 Pro+ to maintain comparable battery life to the Redmi 10X Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro 5G if you prioritize value and efficient 5G connectivity for everyday tasks and light gaming. It’s ideal for users who want a capable phone without breaking the bank. Buy the vivo X50 Pro+ if you demand a more powerful processor for demanding applications, superior camera performance, and a more premium overall experience, even if it means paying a premium.