Redmi 10X Pro 5G vs Realme X50 Pro 5G: Which 5G Flagship Offers the Best Value?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Realme X50 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset offers a noticeable edge in demanding tasks, and the 65W SuperDart charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Redmi 10X Pro remains a viable option for those seeking a more efficient processor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro 5G | Realme X50 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| EDGE | Class 10 | - |
| GPRS | Class 10 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 26 | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, March 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, June 06 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Water-repellent coating | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10+, 600 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 820 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC5 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 11 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Call records | Yes | - |
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Phonebook | 1000 entries, Photocall | - |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.5, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 2 MP | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio; built-in antenna | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML | - |
| Games | Yes | - |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.1 | - |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS, Email | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 58% in 30 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Stand-by | Up to 160 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 2 h 30 min | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4520 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gold, Pink/Blue | Moss Green, Rust Red |
| Models | M2004J7BC | RMX2075, RMX2071, RMX2076 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 90h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 592447 (v8) GeekBench: 3175 (v5.1) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro 5G
- Potentially better thermal efficiency with Dimensity 820
- Competitive 5G performance for its price point
- Decent 33W fast charging
- Less powerful CPU and GPU compared to Snapdragon 865
- Limited display brightness information suggests a less vibrant screen
- Camera specs are undefined, potentially indicating a mid-range experience
Realme X50 Pro 5G
- Superior CPU and GPU performance with Snapdragon 865
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Ultra-fast 65W SuperDart charging
- Snapdragon 865 can run hotter and potentially throttle
- May consume more battery power than the Redmi 10X Pro
- Higher initial cost (when new)
Display Comparison
The Realme X50 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 635 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Redmi 10X Pro. While both feature high refresh rates (assumed based on market positioning), the Realme’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio on the Realme X50 Pro, typical of AMOLED panels, provides deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The Redmi 10X Pro’s display specs are less defined, suggesting a potentially less premium viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Realme X50 Pro, being a flagship, likely incorporates a more sophisticated image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 865, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of details on the Redmi 10X Pro’s camera suggests a more mid-range focus, potentially relying more on software processing to enhance image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X50 Pro’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) utilizes a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core, alongside 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores – compared to the Redmi 10X Pro’s Dimensity 820 (7nm) with its 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. While both are octa-core, the Snapdragon 865’s architecture and higher clock speeds provide a clear advantage in CPU-bound tasks. The Snapdragon 865 also benefits from a more mature Adreno GPU, offering superior graphics performance. Thermal management will be crucial; the Snapdragon 865 is known to run hotter, potentially leading to throttling under sustained load, while the Dimensity 820 aims for a more balanced thermal profile.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 90 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing approaches. The Realme X50 Pro compensates for potentially higher power draw from the Snapdragon 865 with significantly faster 65W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 35 minutes. The Redmi 10X Pro’s 33W charging, while respectable, takes longer to reach a full charge, hitting 58% in 30 minutes. This charging speed difference is a major advantage for the Realme X50 Pro, minimizing downtime for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro 5G if you prioritize efficient power consumption and a potentially cooler operating temperature during extended use. This phone is ideal for users who value battery life and don't necessarily need the absolute fastest processing speeds. Buy the Realme X50 Pro 5G if you demand top-tier performance for gaming, video editing, or other resource-intensive applications, and if minimizing charging time is a key concern. This is the phone for power users.