The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC and Redmi 10X 4G represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a feature-rich experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this goal, primarily through chipset selection and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 732G chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Redmi 10X 4G’s Helio G85, coupled with significantly faster 33W charging. While the Redmi 10X 4G offers a respectable experience, the Poco X3 NFC delivers a more future-proof and responsive user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 26 | 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, May 26 | Available. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 77.2 x 8.9 mm (6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 11 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1
|
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio; built-in antenna | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3
9W reverse wired | 33W wired, 62% in 30 min, 100% in 65 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5020 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Green, White | Cobalt Blue, Shadow Gray |
| Models | M2003J15SC | M2007J20CG, M2007J20CT |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | € 259.00 |
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | Rp 2,800,000 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | € 229.00 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 119.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 125h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1299:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 283750 (v8)
GeekBench: 1777 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 4G
- Reverse wired charging for accessories
- Potentially more power-efficient chipset (due to larger node)
- Slightly more understated design
- Significantly slower charging speeds
- Less powerful chipset for gaming and demanding tasks
- Likely lower-quality camera system
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
- Faster 33W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 732G chipset
- Better gaming performance
- Likely superior camera capabilities
- More aggressive design may not appeal to everyone
- Potentially slightly lower battery life (offset by faster charging)
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1299:1, suggesting similar visual quality in terms of black levels and color depth. However, detailed display specifications like peak brightness and panel type are missing. Given the Poco X3 NFC’s positioning, it’s likely to have a slightly more vibrant display optimized for media consumption. The Redmi 10X 4G, being a more budget-focused device, may prioritize power efficiency over peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the Poco X3 NFC’s overall positioning, it’s reasonable to assume a more capable primary camera sensor. The Redmi 10X 4G likely focuses on providing adequate image quality for everyday use, while the Poco X3 NFC may offer more features and better low-light performance. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X3 NFC’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8nm) is a significant step up from the Redmi 10X 4G’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). The 8nm process node of the Snapdragon 732G translates to better thermal efficiency and sustained performance under load. The Snapdragon 732G’s CPU, with its 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold cores, outperforms the Helio G85’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores in both single-core and multi-core benchmarks. This difference is particularly noticeable in demanding applications and gaming. While both utilize 6x1.8 GHz cores for efficiency, the Kryo architecture offers advantages in power management.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 125 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Poco X3 NFC’s 33W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reach 62% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 65 minutes, significantly faster than the Redmi 10X 4G’s 18W charging with QC3 support. This faster charging capability mitigates any potential battery life differences, making the Poco X3 NFC more convenient for users who need a quick power boost. The Redmi 10X 4G does offer 9W reverse wired charging, a niche feature for charging accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10X 4G if you prioritize a slightly more conservative design and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. You'll appreciate its reverse wired charging. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC if you value gaming performance, faster charging speeds, and a more robust overall experience, even if it means a slightly bolder aesthetic.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 732G in the Poco X3 NFC handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 732G is specifically designed for gaming. It offers a significant performance boost over the Helio G85, allowing for smoother frame rates and a more responsive gaming experience in titles like PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile, even at higher graphics settings. The improved thermal efficiency also helps prevent throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Redmi 10X 4G slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
While 18W charging isn't *terribly* slow, it's considerably slower than the 33W charging on the Poco X3 NFC. Expect a significantly longer time to fully charge the Redmi 10X 4G, potentially taking over two hours. This could be inconvenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the Poco X3 NFC's NFC functionality work with Google Pay and other mobile payment services?
Yes, the 'NFC' in the Poco X3 NFC's name confirms its support for Near Field Communication. This allows you to use the phone with Google Pay, contactless payments at compatible terminals, and other NFC-enabled features.
❓ How does the Helio G85 in the Redmi 10X 4G perform for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
The Helio G85 is perfectly adequate for everyday tasks like browsing the web, checking social media, and using messaging apps. You won't experience significant lag or slowdowns with these activities. However, it will struggle more with demanding applications and multitasking compared to the Snapdragon 732G.
