Xiaomi's Redmi series consistently delivers excellent value for money. The Redmi 10C and Redmi Note 11 are both strong contenders in the budget smartphone market, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down their key differences to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 11 edges out the 10C thanks to its faster charging, brighter display, and generally more refined features. While the 10C is a solid budget option, the Note 11 offers a better overall experience for a small price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 21 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 23 | Available. Released 2022, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 169.6 x 76.6 x 8.3 mm (6.68 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Graphite Gray, Ocean Blue, Mint Green | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue |
| Models | 220333QAG, 220333QBI, 220333QNY, 220333QL | 2201117TG, 2201117TI, 2201117TY, 2201117TL |
| Price | £ 99.00 / € 109.86 | £ 95.00 / € 97.99 / ₹ 11,950 |
| SAR | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 228044 (v8), 244526 (v9)
GeekBench: 1662 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
- Extremely affordable
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Decent battery life
- Sleek design
- Lower display brightness
- Slower charging speed
- Less versatile camera
- Plastic build
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
- Brighter display
- Faster 33W charging
- More versatile camera system
- Slightly more premium feel
- Good battery life
- Slightly more expensive
- Performance not significantly better than 10C
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 boasts a significantly brighter display, measured at 736 nits, compared to the 10C. While both use similar LCD panels, the Note 11's higher brightness makes it easier to view outdoors. The Note 11 also has a reported infinite contrast ratio, suggesting better black levels and overall image quality. The 10C's display is perfectly adequate for indoor use, but lacks the vibrancy of the Note 11.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Redmi Note 11 generally offers a more versatile camera system. It typically includes a higher resolution main sensor and potentially additional lenses (like a macro or depth sensor) not found on the 10C. Image processing and low-light performance are also likely to be better on the Note 11. The 10C's camera is sufficient for casual snapshots, but the Note 11 provides more creative options.
Performance
Both phones share the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset and CPU configuration. Performance will be very similar in everyday tasks. However, the Note 11's software optimization and potentially slightly better thermal management could lead to marginally smoother performance during extended use. Gaming performance will be adequate on both, but don't expect high frame rates on demanding titles.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive battery life, with an endurance rating of 126 hours. However, the Redmi Note 11's 33W fast charging is a significant advantage, allowing it to charge much faster than the 10C's 18W charging. This means less time tethered to a wall outlet.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi 10C is ideal for users prioritizing affordability and basic functionality. It's a great choice for first-time smartphone users or those needing a reliable device for calls, texts, and light social media use. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is better suited for users who value a brighter display, faster charging, and a slightly more premium feel. It's a good option for those who consume media frequently or want a more versatile camera system.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Redmi 10C good for gaming?
The Redmi 10C can handle casual games, but don't expect high frame rates on demanding titles. The Snapdragon 680 is a capable chipset, but not a gaming powerhouse.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones have excellent battery life, rated at 126 hours. However, the Redmi Note 11 charges significantly faster.