Xiaomi Redmi 10C vs Samsung Galaxy A13: The Ultimate Budget Battle

The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Xiaomi Redmi 10C and Samsung Galaxy A13 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at affordable prices, but which one delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A13 edges out the Redmi 10C thanks to its brighter display, slightly more refined software, and longer software support. While the Redmi 10C boasts a more efficient chipset, the A13's overall package provides a more polished user experience for most.

PHONES
Phone Names Xiaomi Redmi 10C Samsung Galaxy A13
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2022, March 212022, March 04
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, March 23Available. Released 2022, March 23
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions169.6 x 76.6 x 8.3 mm (6.68 x 3.02 x 0.33 in)165.1 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.5 x 3.01 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight190 g (6.70 oz)195 g (6.88 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla GlassCorning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density)1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density)
Size6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDPLS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)Exynos 850 (8 nm)
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G52
OSAndroid 11, MIUI 13Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 UFS 2.2eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens-
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, panorama, HDR
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Single5 MP, f/2.28 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single5 MP, f/2.28 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCYes (market/region dependent)Yes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEOGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximityFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass
 -Virtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging18W wired15W wired
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGraphite Gray, Ocean Blue, Mint GreenBlack, White, Peach, Blue
Models220333QAG, 220333QBI, 220333QNY, 220333QLSM-A135F, SM-A135F/DS, SM-A135M, SM-A135U, SM-A135U1, SM-A135N
Price£ 99.00 / € 109.86€ 94.99 / $ 129.99 / £ 89.00
SAR0.96 W/kg (head)     1.02 W/kg (body)0.49 W/kg (head)
SAR EU0.57 W/kg (head)     0.96 W/kg (body)0.37 W/kg (head)     1.39 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 114h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1324:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -29.7 LUFS (Average)
Performance- AnTuTu: 122822 (v8), 136286 (v9) GeekBench: 588 (v5.1) GFXBench: 5.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Xiaomi Redmi 10C

  • More efficient chipset
  • Slightly more modern design
  • Competitive price

  • Less bright display
  • Potentially shorter software support
  • Average camera performance

Samsung Galaxy A13

  • Brighter display
  • Longer battery life
  • Reliable brand reputation
  • Longer software support

  • Less efficient chipset
  • Slightly older design
  • Average camera performance

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A13 takes the display crown. While both offer a 6.6-inch display, the A13's measured 587 nits peak brightness significantly outperforms the Redmi 10C, making it easier to view outdoors. The contrast ratio is similar, but the A13's brightness is a noticeable advantage. The Redmi 10C's display is adequate but lacks the vibrancy of the A13.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is fairly comparable. Both offer multiple lenses, but image quality is decent rather than exceptional. The A13 might offer slightly better image processing in certain scenarios. Low-light performance is a weakness for both devices. Expect usable photos in good lighting conditions.

Performance

The Redmi 10C's Snapdragon 680 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers a slight edge in efficiency and potentially smoother performance in some tasks compared to the Galaxy A13's Exynos 850 (8nm). However, in everyday use, the difference is often negligible. Both phones handle basic tasks and social media with ease.

Battery Life

The Galaxy A13 shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 114 hours. While the Redmi 10C also offers good battery life, it doesn't quite match the A13's longevity. Both support 18W charging, but the A13's larger battery means it will take longer to fully charge.

Buying Guide

The Xiaomi Redmi 10C is ideal for users prioritizing raw performance and a slightly more modern design on a tight budget. The Samsung Galaxy A13 is a better choice for those who value a vibrant display, reliable brand reputation, and longer software updates.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A13 generally receives longer software updates and security patches compared to the Xiaomi Redmi 10C.
❓ Is the Redmi 10C's chipset faster?
The Redmi 10C's Snapdragon 680 is slightly more efficient and potentially faster in some benchmarks, but the real-world difference is often minimal.