The Xiaomi Redmi 10 and Oppo A74 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches. The Redmi 10 prioritizes endurance and a slightly more powerful processor, while the A74 focuses on faster charging and a more efficient chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a bit more raw processing power, the Xiaomi Redmi 10 is the better choice. Its significantly longer endurance rating (127h) and more potent Helio G88 chipset outweigh the Oppo A74’s faster charging, especially considering the A74’s Snapdragon 662 is built on a more efficient, but ultimately less powerful, architecture.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 18 | 2021, April 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 20 | Available. Released 2021, May 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0”, 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
9W reverse wired | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Carbon Gray, Pebble White, Sea Blue | Prism Black, Midnight Blue |
| Models | 21061119AG, 21061119DG, 21061119AL | CHP2219 |
| Price | € 104.99 / $ 139.99 / £ 107.27 | About 300 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi 10
- Exceptional battery life (127h endurance)
- More powerful processor (Helio G88)
- Higher contrast ratio display
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Larger chipset node (12nm) potentially impacting efficiency
Oppo A74
- Faster charging (33W, 54% in 30min)
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 662, 11nm)
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Lower battery endurance
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
The Redmi 10 boasts a measured peak brightness of 477 nits and a 1494:1 contrast ratio, providing a reasonably vibrant viewing experience. While the A74’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely to offer similar brightness levels given its market segment. However, the Redmi 10’s higher contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and a more visually appealing image. Neither phone is expected to feature advanced display technologies like LTPO, so refresh rates are likely standard 60Hz. Bezels are expected to be comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within the budget constraints.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are expected to feature multi-camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. Focusing on the primary sensors is crucial; without specifics, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit. Image processing will likely differ, with Xiaomi often favoring more saturated colors and Oppo leaning towards a more natural look. Without sample images and detailed sensor specs, a concrete camera comparison is impossible.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Redmi 10 utilizes the Mediatek Helio G88 (12nm) with its octa-core configuration (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55), while the Oppo A74 features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm) with its own octa-core setup (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver). The Helio G88, despite being built on a larger 12nm process, generally offers slightly better raw performance due to its more powerful Cortex-A75 cores. The Snapdragon 662, however, benefits from Qualcomm’s optimizations and a more efficient 11nm node, potentially leading to better sustained performance under load. The A74’s Kryo 260 Gold cores are designed for efficiency, but lack the peak performance of the A75 cores in the Redmi 10.
Battery Life
The Redmi 10 shines in battery endurance, boasting a remarkable 127-hour rating. This suggests a larger battery capacity and efficient power management. The Oppo A74 compensates with significantly faster 33W wired charging, capable of reaching 54% charge in just 30 minutes. The Redmi 10’s 18W charging is considerably slower. While the A74’s faster charging is convenient, the Redmi 10’s superior endurance means fewer charging cycles are needed, potentially extending the battery’s lifespan. The trade-off is between convenience and longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10 if you need exceptional battery life for extended use, frequently engage in moderate gaming, or prioritize a slightly more responsive user experience. Buy the Oppo A74 if you value rapid charging above all else, prefer a more power-efficient chipset for lighter tasks, and want to minimize downtime spent tethered to a wall outlet. The A74 is ideal for users who top up their phones frequently rather than relying on a single, long-lasting charge.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G88 in the Redmi 10 struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Helio G88 isn't a flagship chipset, it's capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense firefights, but it's generally playable. The Snapdragon 662 in the A74 might offer slightly more consistent frame rates at lower settings due to its efficiency, but the Redmi 10's raw power provides a higher ceiling.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Oppo A74 compared to the 18W charging on the Redmi 10 in real-world use?
The Oppo A74's 33W charging is significantly faster. Reaching 54% in 30 minutes is a substantial advantage. The Redmi 10's 18W charging will take considerably longer – likely over 1.5 hours for a full charge. This makes the A74 ideal for users who need a quick top-up before leaving the house.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo A74 overheat during prolonged use, like video recording or gaming?
The Snapdragon 662 is known for its relatively good thermal management. While it can get warm during extended use, it's unlikely to overheat to the point of significant performance throttling. The 11nm process contributes to its efficiency, helping to dissipate heat more effectively than the Redmi 10's 12nm Helio G88 under sustained load.
