Xiaomi Redmi 10 Prime 2022 vs. Motorola Moto G71 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing 5G connectivity and faster charging, the Motorola Moto G71 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 695, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a noticeable performance advantage and better thermal management, while the 30W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Redmi 10 Prime remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi 10 Prime 2022 | Motorola Moto G71 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat15 800/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - PRC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 09 | 2021, November 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 09 | Available. Released 2022, January 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.5 x 9.6 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.38 in) | 161.2 x 73.9 x 8.5 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Dust & splash proof | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 9W reverse wired | 30W / 33W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Astral White, Bifrost Blue, Phantom Black | Neptune Green, Arctic Blue, Iron Black |
| Models | 22011119TI | XT2169-1, XT2169-2 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| SAR | 1.10 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.16 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Prime 2022
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional and reliable performance for basic tasks
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower charging speeds (18W)
- Less efficient chipset (Helio G88)
- Potentially more thermal throttling under load
Motorola Moto G71 5G
- Faster 30W/33W charging
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 695)
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Potentially higher price
- No reverse wireless charging
- May not offer significantly improved camera performance in all scenarios
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness in nits or color gamut coverage) are absent, the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The Redmi 10 Prime’s Helio G88 will likely exhibit slightly more strain rendering complex visuals, potentially impacting smoothness. Bezels are expected to be comparable given the price bracket, and both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, meaning color accuracy won't be a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information beyond the main cameras, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Motorola Moto G71 5G likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), which generally delivers superior image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The Redmi 10 Prime relies on MediaTek’s ISP, which is competent but typically lags behind Qualcomm’s offerings. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests a reliance on software stabilization, where the Snapdragon’s processing power could again provide an advantage. The prevalence of 2MP macro/depth sensors on both phones suggests these are largely marketing features with limited real-world utility.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant distinction. The Motorola Moto G71 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, fabricated on a 6nm process, is demonstrably more efficient than the Redmi 10 Prime’s MediaTek Helio G88 (12nm). This translates to better sustained performance under load, less thermal throttling during gaming, and improved battery life. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer a frequency advantage over the Redmi’s Cortex-A75 cores (2.0 GHz). While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural improvements and process node of the Snapdragon give it a clear edge. The G71 also benefits from potentially faster RAM speeds, though specific LPDDR versions aren't specified.
Battery Life
The Redmi 10 Prime’s 18W charging is significantly slower than the Moto G71 5G’s 30W/33W charging, which Motorola claims can deliver a 50% charge in just 30 minutes. While the Redmi 10 Prime may have a slightly larger battery capacity (unspecified), the faster charging of the Moto G71 5G minimizes downtime. The Snapdragon 695’s 6nm efficiency also contributes to better battery life, offsetting any potential capacity difference. Users who frequently top up their phones will greatly appreciate the Moto G71’s faster charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10 Prime 2022 if you need a functional, reliable smartphone with a focus on affordability and aren't heavily reliant on 5G or demanding mobile gaming. Buy the Motorola Moto G71 5G if you prioritize 5G connectivity, faster charging speeds, and a more responsive user experience, even if it means spending slightly more.