The Xiaomi Redmi 10 Prime 2022 and Motorola Moto G60S represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone space. Both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The Redmi 10 Prime focuses on a balanced feature set, while the Moto G60S prioritizes faster charging and a slightly more powerful chipset. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right phone.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G60S emerges as the better choice. Its Helio G95 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge over the Redmi 10 Prime’s Helio G88, and the 50W fast charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Redmi 10 Prime offers a respectable package, the G60S’s speed and convenience justify the potential price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 09 | 2021, August 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 09 | Available. Released 2021, August 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.5 x 9.6 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.38 in) | 169.7 x 75.9 x 9.6 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| | Dust & splash proof | Water repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 562 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
9W reverse wired | 50W wired, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Astral White, Bifrost Blue, Phantom Black | Green, Blue |
| Models | 22011119TI | XT2133-2, XT2133-1 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 1.10 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Prime 2022
- Potentially lower price point
- 9W reverse wired charging
- Balanced feature set for everyday use
- Less powerful Helio G88 chipset
- Slower 18W charging
Motorola Moto G60S
- More powerful Helio G95 chipset
- Significantly faster 50W charging with QC4
- Better performance for gaming and multitasking
- Potentially higher price
- May not offer reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
Neither phone boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The key difference lies in processing power, not panel quality. While specific nit brightness isn't provided, both will likely struggle in direct sunlight. The absence of high refresh rates (90Hz or 120Hz) on either device means scrolling and animations won't be as fluid as on more premium phones.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, the Moto G60S likely benefits from the increased processing power of the Helio G95, enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Redmi 10 Prime’s camera system will likely be adequate for casual photography, but the G60S has the potential to capture more detailed and vibrant images. It's important to note that the inclusion of 2MP macro or depth sensors on either phone adds minimal value to the overall camera experience.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G60S holds a clear advantage in performance thanks to its Mediatek Helio G95 chipset. The G95 utilizes two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz, a step up from the Redmi 10 Prime’s Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This architectural difference translates to better single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launching and smoother multitasking. The G95’s slightly higher clock speeds on the efficiency cores (A55) also contribute to sustained performance during longer gaming sessions. While both phones use 12nm process technology, the G95’s core design is more efficient.
Battery Life
The Moto G60S’s 50W wired charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4) is a game-changer. This allows for significantly faster charging times compared to the Redmi 10 Prime’s 18W charging. While the Redmi 10 Prime offers 9W reverse wired charging, a niche feature, the G60S prioritizes getting you back to 100% quickly. The actual battery capacity isn't specified, but the faster charging speed of the G60S effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10 Prime 2022 if you prioritize a consistently affordable price and don't heavily rely on demanding mobile games or applications. It's a solid all-rounder for everyday tasks. Buy the Motorola Moto G60S if you value faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and if minimizing charging time is a key concern. The 50W charging is a significant advantage for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Moto G60S’s Helio G95 chipset overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Helio G95 is more powerful, it's still a mid-range chipset. Motorola likely employs thermal management techniques to prevent overheating. However, expect some throttling after extended periods of demanding gameplay. The G95's efficiency cores help mitigate this compared to the G88.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Redmi 10 Prime slow compared to the Moto G60S’s 50W charging?
Yes, the difference is substantial. 18W charging will take significantly longer to fully charge the Redmi 10 Prime. The Moto G60S’s 50W charging can add hours of usage in just minutes, making it ideal for users who are frequently on the go.
❓ Does either phone support expandable storage via microSD card?
While not explicitly stated, both Xiaomi and Motorola frequently include microSD card slots in their budget offerings. It's highly probable that both the Redmi 10 Prime and Moto G60S support expandable storage, allowing you to increase the internal storage capacity.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Xiaomi’s MIUI and Motorola’s near-stock Android?
Motorola’s software is closer to stock Android, offering a cleaner and more streamlined experience with fewer pre-installed apps (bloatware). Xiaomi’s MIUI is heavily customized, offering a wider range of features but potentially feeling cluttered to some users. Updates may also be faster on the Motorola.
