Xiaomi’s Redmi and Poco lines often overlap in the budget segment, creating tough choices for consumers. The Redmi 10 (India) focuses on efficient performance with the Snapdragon 680, while the Poco M4 Pro aims for a more robust experience with the Helio G96 and faster charging. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a brighter display, the Poco M4 Pro is the better choice. Its 33W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the 737 nits peak brightness improves outdoor visibility. However, the Redmi 10 offers a more power-efficient chipset for extended battery life during light use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 17 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 24 | Available. Released 2022, March 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 169.6 x 76.6 x 9.1 mm (6.68 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 179.5 g (6.31 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1650 pixels (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 106.2 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 58 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Pacific Blue, Caribbean Green | Power Black, Cool Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | 220333QAG | MZB0B5VIN, 2201117PI, 2201117PG |
| Price | About 130 EUR | € 100.18 |
| SAR | - | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.2 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318444 (v9)
GeekBench: 1836 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (India)
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance due to thermal efficiency
- Lower price point (likely)
- Slower 18W charging
- Less detailed display specifications
- Potentially weaker camera system
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro
- Faster 33W charging with PD3.0/QC3
- Brighter 737 nits display
- More powerful Helio G96 processor for short bursts
- Less power-efficient Helio G96 chipset
- Potential for more thermal throttling
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Poco M4 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 737 nits, compared to the Redmi 10’s unspecified brightness. This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility, giving the Poco M4 Pro a clear advantage in sunny conditions. While both displays share an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for IPS LCDs), the higher peak brightness of the Poco M4 Pro translates to a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. The Redmi 10’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a more standard LCD panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning of the Poco M4 Pro suggests a potentially more capable camera system, likely with a larger main sensor. The Redmi 10, being a more budget-focused device, likely utilizes a more basic camera setup. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely inconsequential, offering limited practical benefit due to the low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The chipset choice defines the performance profiles of these devices. The Poco M4 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm) features a more powerful CPU configuration – 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the Redmi 10’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) with its 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver cores. However, the Snapdragon 680’s 6nm process offers superior power efficiency. This means the Redmi 10 will likely exhibit less thermal throttling during sustained workloads, despite the Helio G96’s theoretical performance advantage. The Redmi 10 will be better for sustained, lighter tasks, while the Poco M4 Pro can handle short bursts of demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 126 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Poco M4 Pro’s 33W wired charging (with PD3.0 and QC3 support) is a significant advantage, achieving a full charge in just 58 minutes. The Redmi 10 is limited to 18W charging, resulting in a considerably longer charging time. While the Snapdragon 680’s efficiency contributes to good battery life on the Redmi 10, the Poco M4 Pro’s faster charging mitigates any potential battery life differences for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10 (India) if you need a phone that prioritizes all-day battery life with moderate usage and value a more efficient processor. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro if you prefer faster charging speeds, a brighter display for media consumption, and are willing to trade some battery efficiency for increased performance in demanding tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Helio G96 in the Poco M4 Pro get noticeably hot during gaming?
The Helio G96 is known to generate more heat than the Snapdragon 680. While the Poco M4 Pro has thermal management features, extended gaming sessions may lead to noticeable warming and potential performance throttling. The Redmi 10’s Snapdragon 680 will likely remain cooler for longer periods.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Redmi 10 slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
Yes, 18W charging is significantly slower than the Poco M4 Pro’s 33W charging. Expect a full charge to take well over two hours, which may be frustrating for users accustomed to faster charging speeds. This is the biggest drawback of the Redmi 10.
❓ Will I see a significant difference in app loading times between these two phones?
You'll likely notice a slight difference in app loading times, with the Poco M4 Pro generally being faster due to its more powerful CPU. However, the difference won't be dramatic for everyday tasks like browsing or social media. The Snapdragon 680 is still capable of handling these tasks smoothly.
❓ Are the camera differences between these phones noticeable in well-lit conditions?
Without detailed camera specs, it's hard to say definitively. However, the Poco M4 Pro likely has an advantage in well-lit conditions due to a potentially larger sensor and better image processing. Expect slightly more detail and dynamic range from the Poco M4 Pro's camera.
