The Xiaomi Redmi 10 (India) and Oppo F19s represent compelling options in the competitive sub-₹15,000 smartphone segment. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, they diverge significantly in their core processing power and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences, focusing on the implications for everyday users and performance-minded individuals.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing efficiency and sustained performance, the Xiaomi Redmi 10 (India) emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 680, built on a 6nm process, offers better power efficiency and potentially less thermal throttling compared to the Oppo F19s’ Snapdragon 662. However, the F19s’ 33W charging is a significant advantage for those who value rapid top-ups.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 17 | 2021, September 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 24 | Available. Released 2021, September 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 169.6 x 76.6 x 9.1 mm (6.68 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1650 pixels (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 106.2 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Pacific Blue, Caribbean Green | Glowing Black, Glowing Gold |
| Models | 220333QAG | CPH2219, CPH2223 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 230 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (India)
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 processor
- Potentially longer battery life due to 6nm process
- Slightly faster CPU clock speeds
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely standard LCD display
Oppo F19s
- Significantly faster 33W charging
- Quick 54% charge in 30 minutes
- Potentially optimized software for quick tasks
- Less efficient Snapdragon 662 processor
- Potentially shorter battery life
- 11nm process may lead to more thermal throttling
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on processing, we can infer both likely utilize standard LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of information regarding refresh rates suggests both are likely 60Hz. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of budget devices. Color accuracy is unlikely to be a key differentiator, with both likely covering around 70-80% of the sRGB color gamut.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature a primary camera around 13-50MP, accompanied by depth and macro sensors. The Redmi 10’s more powerful processor could offer slightly better image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in improved dynamic range and noise reduction. The Oppo F19s may focus on software-driven beautification features, a common strategy for Oppo’s marketing. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on both is largely a marketing gimmick and unlikely to deliver significant photographic value.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi 10’s Snapdragon 680 (6nm) is a more modern design than the Oppo F19s’ Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 6nm process inherently leads to better power efficiency, meaning the Redmi 10 should deliver longer battery life for the same level of usage. The CPU configuration – Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) on the Redmi 10 versus Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) on the F19s – indicates a slight clock speed advantage for the Redmi 10’s prime cores. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both are 4G-only, the more efficient chipset in the Redmi 10 will likely result in better signal processing and data speeds.
Battery Life
The Redmi 10’s 18W charging is significantly slower than the Oppo F19s’ 33W charging. Oppo claims 54% charge in 30 minutes, a substantial advantage for users who need a quick power boost. While the Redmi 10’s more efficient chipset will likely result in longer overall battery life, the F19s’ faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery capacity (spec not provided). The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 680 will allow the Redmi 10 to sip power during standby and light usage, extending its usability throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10 (India) if you need a phone that balances performance with battery life, and anticipate moderate to heavy daily usage including multitasking and occasional gaming. Buy the Oppo F19s if you prioritize fast charging above all else, and your usage is primarily focused on basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media browsing. The F19s is also a better fit for users who frequently find themselves needing to quickly replenish their battery.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 680 in the Redmi 10 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 680 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The 6nm process will help mitigate thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions, but it's not a dedicated gaming chipset. Expect playable performance, but not the highest graphical fidelity.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Oppo F19s compared to the 18W charging on the Redmi 10 in real-world use?
The Oppo F19s’ 33W charging can add approximately 54% battery in 30 minutes, while the Redmi 10’s 18W charging will take considerably longer – likely over an hour to achieve a similar charge level. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery.
❓ Does the Redmi 10's processor offer a noticeable improvement in multitasking compared to the F19s?
Yes, the Redmi 10’s Snapdragon 680, with its newer architecture and slightly higher clock speeds, will provide a more responsive multitasking experience. Switching between apps and running multiple applications simultaneously should be smoother on the Redmi 10.
