Poco X7 vs Redmi Note 12 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Xiaomi's Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly faster 120W charging (19 minutes to full) and impressive 88-hour endurance rating outweigh the Poco X7’s slightly newer chipset. However, the Poco X7 offers a brighter display and a more modern processor architecture.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco X7 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 09 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 09 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.4 x 8.4 mm or 8.6 mm | 162.9 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 185.5 g or 190 g (6.70 oz) | 208.4 g (7.34 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1200 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 100% in 52 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min (advertised) |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· 5110 mAh (Global)· 5500 mAh (India only) | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Silver | Arctic White, Iceberg Blue, Obsidian Black, Trend edition |
| Models | 24095PCADG | 22101316UCP, 22101316UG |
| Price | $ 275.00 / £ 169.00 / € 199.90 / ₹ 16,799 | $ 348.00 / £ 439.00 / € 399.00 / ₹ 29,949 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.7 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 498710 (v9) GeekBench: 2208 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 40:51h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco X7
- Brighter display (1111 nits)
- More modern 4nm chipset
- Potentially better long-term software support
- Significantly lower battery endurance (40:51h)
- Slower charging speed (52 minutes)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+
- Exceptional battery life (88h endurance)
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (19 minutes)
- Likely more refined camera system
- Older 6nm chipset
- Display brightness not specified
Display Comparison
The Poco X7 boasts a peak brightness of 1111 nits, a substantial advantage over the Redmi Note 12 Pro+, which lacks a measured brightness figure. While the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ claims an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, this is a standard marketing term. The X7’s higher brightness will translate to better visibility in direct sunlight. Both devices likely utilize AMOLED panels, common in this price bracket, but the X7’s brightness gives it a clear edge for outdoor use. We lack data on refresh rates and PWM dimming for both, but this is a critical area for eye comfort.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is advertised with a focus on its camera capabilities, though specific sensor details are missing. The Poco X7 lacks any camera specifications in the provided data. Given the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s marketing, it likely features a higher-resolution main sensor and potentially more advanced image processing. Without detailed sensor information for the Poco X7, it’s difficult to assess its camera performance. The presence of a 'Photo / Video' designation for the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ suggests a more comprehensive camera feature set.
Performance
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6nm), featuring a 2x2 core configuration for its Cortex-A78 performance cores, paired with 6x Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. The Poco X7, however, employs the Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4nm) with a 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The 4nm process of the 7300 Ultra should offer improved power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance under load, reducing thermal throttling. While the 1080 has a slightly higher clock speed on its A78 cores, the architectural improvements and process node shrink of the 7300 Ultra likely provide a performance advantage in demanding tasks. Both devices benefit from ample RAM, though specific configurations aren't provided.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ boasts an impressive 88-hour endurance rating, significantly exceeding the Poco X7’s 40:51h endurance. This difference is largely attributable to the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s 120W charging, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes (advertised). The Poco X7’s 45W charging takes 52 minutes to reach 100%. While the Poco X7’s battery has a 1000 cycle lifespan claim, the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s faster charging and longer endurance make it the more convenient option for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco X7 if you prioritize a brighter display for outdoor visibility and want a more recent processor architecture that *may* offer better long-term software support. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ if you value incredibly fast charging, exceptional battery life, and a proven track record of reliable performance, even if the chipset is a generation older.