Poco X7 vs. Samsung Galaxy A54: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and faster charging, the Poco X7 emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7300 Ultra chipset and 45W charging offer a noticeable advantage. However, the Galaxy A54 remains a strong contender for those valuing Samsung’s software ecosystem and potentially more refined camera processing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco X7 | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 09 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 09 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.4 x 8.4 mm or 8.6 mm | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185.5 g or 190 g (6.70 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1200 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 100% in 52 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· 5110 mAh (Global)· 5500 mAh (India only) | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Silver | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | 24095PCADG | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | $ 275.00 / £ 169.00 / € 199.90 / ₹ 16,799 | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 40:51h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco X7
- Faster charging (45W vs 25W)
- Brighter display (1111 nits)
- Potentially better performance with Dimensity 7300 Ultra
- Battery endurance rating is lower
- Camera performance is unknown without detailed specs
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Established Samsung software ecosystem
- Potentially more refined camera processing
- Higher endurance rating
- Slower charging speed
- Dimmer display
- Exynos 1380 may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Poco X7 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1111 nits compared to the Galaxy A54’s 980 nits. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both feature excellent contrast ratios (Samsung advertises 'Infinite'), the higher peak brightness of the Poco X7 provides a more vibrant viewing experience. Both phones likely utilize AMOLED panels, but the Poco X7’s brightness advantage is a key differentiator. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, and color accuracy is not specified in the provided data, but Samsung typically excels in this area.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is missing. The absence of specific details necessitates caution. Samsung’s image processing is generally known for producing vibrant, saturated images, while Xiaomi often aims for a more natural look. Without knowing sensor sizes or aperture values, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for video recording and low-light photography. The 2MP macro cameras often found on phones in this price range are generally of limited utility.
Performance
The Poco X7’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4nm) and the Galaxy A54’s Exynos 1380 (5nm) represent different approaches to performance. The 4nm process of the Dimensity 7300 Ultra generally offers better power efficiency, potentially leading to sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. While both CPUs feature an octa-core configuration with 4x Cortex-A78 and 4x Cortex-A55 cores, the Dimensity 7300 Ultra’s A78 cores are clocked slightly higher at 2.5 GHz versus 2.4 GHz on the Exynos 1380. This, combined with the more efficient node, suggests a performance edge for the Poco X7 in CPU-intensive tasks. RAM speed is not specified, but LPDDR5X would be expected in this class, and any difference would be minimal.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A54 has an endurance rating of 119 hours, while the Poco X7 offers 40:51h endurance. However, the endurance rating is a broad metric. The Poco X7’s active use score of 11:07h is very close to the Galaxy A54’s 11:15h, suggesting similar real-world usage. The Poco X7 compensates with significantly faster charging at 45W, achieving a full charge in 52 minutes, compared to the Galaxy A54’s slower 25W charging. This faster charging is a major advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco X7 if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value fast charging speeds. You’ll benefit from the newer chipset and quicker power-up times. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A54 if you prefer a polished software experience, a potentially more consistent camera, and a brand known for long-term software support. It’s the safer bet for users prioritizing reliability and ecosystem integration.