Poco X7 vs Oppo Reno10 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Oppo Reno10 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset offers a significant performance advantage. However, the Poco X7 provides excellent value, boasting impressive battery endurance and a bright display at a lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco X7 | Oppo Reno10 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 09 | 2023, May 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 09 | Available. Released 2023, May 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.4 x 8.4 mm or 8.6 mm | 162.9 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.41 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185.5 g or 190 g (6.70 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1200 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.5, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 100% in 52 min | 100W wired, PD, QC3 Reverse wired |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· 5110 mAh (Global)· 5500 mAh (India only) | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Silver | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple, Gold |
| Models | 24095PCADG | PHU110, CPH2521 |
| Price | $ 275.00 / £ 169.00 / € 199.90 / ₹ 16,799 | About 540 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 40:51h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco X7
- Exceptional battery life (40:51h endurance)
- Bright display (1111 nits)
- Excellent value for money
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Reno10 Pro+
- Slower charging speed (45W)
Oppo Reno10 Pro+
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
- Ultra-fast 100W charging
- Likely superior camera performance
- Potentially shorter battery life
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Poco X7 features a display capable of reaching 1111 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno10 Pro+’s display specs aren’t provided, Oppo typically equips its ‘Pro’ models with high-quality AMOLED panels. The X7’s brightness is a key advantage, particularly for outdoor use. Without knowing the Reno10 Pro+'s panel technology (LTPO or not), it's difficult to assess power efficiency, but the X7’s brightness is a concrete benefit.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Reno10 Pro+’s positioning suggests a more sophisticated camera system. Oppo often prioritizes image processing and sensor quality in its ‘Pro+’ line. The absence of information on sensor sizes and OIS for the Poco X7 makes it difficult to assess its photographic capabilities. It’s reasonable to assume the Reno10 Pro+ will deliver superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, due to its likely larger sensor and more advanced image signal processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno10 Pro+ utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, designed for peak performance. The Poco X7, conversely, employs the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4nm) with a Cortex-A78 based core configuration. While the Dimensity 7300 Ultra is a capable chip, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s architecture provides a noticeable edge in CPU-intensive tasks and sustained GPU performance. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app launches, and higher frame rates in demanding games. The Reno10 Pro+ will likely exhibit less thermal throttling under prolonged load.
Battery Life
The Poco X7 boasts impressive battery endurance, achieving 40:51 hours of total usage and 11:07 hours of active use. This is coupled with 45W wired charging, reaching 100% in 52 minutes. The Reno10 Pro+ counters with a blazing-fast 100W SuperVOOC charging, utilizing PD and QC3 standards, and reverse wired charging. While the Reno10 Pro+'s battery capacity is unknown, the 100W charging significantly reduces downtime. The Poco X7 prioritizes longevity, while the Reno10 Pro+ focuses on minimizing charging interruptions. The faster charging of the Reno10 Pro+ is a significant convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco X7 if you need exceptional battery life and a vibrant display for everyday tasks and casual gaming, all while staying within a strict budget. Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro+ if you prioritize demanding gaming, faster app loading times, and the convenience of incredibly fast 100W charging, even if it means spending more.