Poco X7 vs. Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X7 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra chipset, coupled with a measured peak brightness of 1111 nits, provides a noticeable performance and viewing experience advantage. While the Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging is appealing, the X7’s superior endurance and processing power make it the better all-rounder.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco X7 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 09 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 09 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.4 x 8.4 mm or 8.6 mm | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185.5 g or 190 g (6.70 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1200 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 100% in 52 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· 5110 mAh (Global)· 5500 mAh (India only) | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Silver | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | 24095PCADG | XT2307-1 |
| Price | $ 275.00 / £ 169.00 / € 199.90 / ₹ 16,799 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 40:51h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco X7
- Superior chipset performance with Dimensity 7300 Ultra
- Longer battery endurance (40:51h)
- Brighter display (1111 nits)
- Charging speed is slower than the Edge 40 Neo
- Camera details are currently unknown
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster charging (68W, 50% in 15 min)
- Potentially better camera software and video stabilization
- Sleek design and potentially cleaner software experience
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 7030)
- Shorter battery endurance
Display Comparison
Both the Poco X7 and Edge 40 Neo feature displays capable of reaching over 1000 nits of peak brightness, with the Poco X7 slightly edging out the competition at 1111 nits versus the Edge 40 Neo’s 1073 nits. This difference, while not massive, will be more noticeable in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (not specified in the data), the lack of refresh rate information prevents a full assessment of smoothness. The Edge 40 Neo’s marketing often highlights its display quality, but the X7’s higher peak brightness provides a tangible advantage for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
The provided data is limited regarding camera capabilities. The Edge 40 Neo is marketed with a focus on photo and video, implying a more refined camera experience. However, without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. It’s reasonable to assume the Edge 40 Neo will offer a more polished camera app and potentially better video stabilization, but the X7’s potential for computational photography improvements with its more powerful chipset shouldn’t be discounted. The absence of details on the X7’s camera system makes it hard to assess its capabilities beyond speculation.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Poco X7 boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4nm) while the Edge 40 Neo uses the Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The 4nm process node of the 7300 Ultra translates to improved power efficiency and potentially lower thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The CPU configuration also favors the X7 with 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, suggesting better multi-core performance. While both chips are capable, the X7 is positioned for a more demanding user.
Battery Life
The Poco X7 demonstrates superior battery endurance with a measured 40:51h endurance rating, significantly exceeding the Edge 40 Neo’s older 80h rating (which is less reliable as a direct comparison metric). The X7 also achieves 11:07h of active use, compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s 10:28h. While the Edge 40 Neo compensates with 68W wired charging (50% in 15 minutes), the X7’s 45W charging (100% in 52 minutes) is adequate given its larger endurance. The X7’s longer battery life is a clear win for users who prioritize all-day usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco X7 if you prioritize gaming performance, demanding multitasking, and a brighter display for outdoor visibility. It’s ideal for users who frequently consume media and need a phone that can keep up with intensive tasks. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value faster charging speeds and a more refined software experience, and are willing to trade some raw processing power for convenience and a potentially cleaner Android implementation.