Poco X7 vs Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and a polished software experience, the Google Pixel 7a remains the superior choice. However, gamers and power users who value fast charging and sustained performance will find the Poco X7 a more compelling option, offering excellent value for its price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco X7 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 09 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 09 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.4 x 8.4 mm or 8.6 mm | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 185.5 g or 190 g (6.70 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1200 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 100% in 52 min | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· 5110 mAh (Global)· 5500 mAh (India only) | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Silver | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | 24095PCADG | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | $ 275.00 / £ 169.00 / € 199.90 / ₹ 16,799 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 40:51h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco X7
- Significantly faster 45W charging
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Strong CPU performance for gaming and multitasking
- Camera likely inferior to Pixel 7a
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel 7a
Google Pixel 7a
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Smooth and refined software experience with guaranteed updates
- Wireless charging convenience
- Slow 18W wired charging
- Chipset may throttle under sustained heavy load
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays capable of reaching over 1000 nits of peak brightness – the Poco X7 hitting 1111 nits and the Pixel 7a at 1070 nits – ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While both are bright, the Pixel 7a’s display benefits from Google’s color calibration expertise, likely offering more accurate colors out of the box. Neither specification details refresh rate, but the Pixel 7a is known to have a 90Hz panel, which the Poco X7 may or may not match. The slightly higher peak brightness of the Poco X7 gives it a marginal edge for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera is its defining feature. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, Google’s computational photography prowess elevates image quality significantly. The Tensor G2’s image signal processor (ISP) is optimized for processing photos and videos, resulting in excellent dynamic range and detail. The Poco X7’s camera capabilities are less emphasized in the provided data. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The Pixel 7a’s strength lies in its consistent image quality across various conditions, while the Poco X7’s camera is likely more reliant on good lighting.
Performance
The chipset is where these phones diverge significantly. The Poco X7 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a focus on performance with its Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz. The Pixel 7a, however, is powered by Google’s Tensor G2 (5nm). While the Tensor G2’s Cortex-X1 cores reach a higher clock speed (2.85 GHz), the 5nm process node offers better power efficiency. The Dimensity 7300 Ultra’s 4nm node should translate to better thermal management during sustained loads, potentially reducing throttling in extended gaming sessions. The Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 excels in AI and machine learning tasks, powering features like Magic Eraser and Real Tone, but the Poco X7 will likely outperform it in raw graphical processing.
Battery Life
The Poco X7 boasts impressive battery endurance, achieving 40:51 hours in our tests and fully charging in just 52 minutes with its 45W wired charging. The Pixel 7a, with an older endurance rating of 76 hours, appears to have a larger battery capacity, but charges much slower at 18W. The Poco X7’s faster charging is a significant advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery. While the Pixel 7a’s endurance rating is higher, the Poco X7’s active use score of 11:07h suggests it can handle demanding tasks without quickly depleting its battery. The inclusion of wireless charging on the Pixel 7a (7.5W) offers added convenience, but the charging speed is considerably slower than the Poco X7’s wired charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco X7 if you need a phone for demanding mobile games, frequent fast charging, and prioritize raw processing power. It’s ideal for users who spend a lot of time on their phones and want a device that can keep up. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prefer a best-in-class camera experience, seamless software updates, and a refined user interface. It’s perfect for photography enthusiasts and those deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem.