Poco X7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A54: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the Poco X7 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8400 Ultra chipset and 90W charging significantly outperform the Galaxy A54’s Exynos 1380 and 25W charging. However, Samsung’s software and established brand reputation make the A54 a strong contender for those valuing a polished, reliable experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 09 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 09 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic back, silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.33 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g or 198 g (6.88 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1400 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra (4 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4/6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 42 min Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 6550 mAh (India only) | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black/Yellow, White, Green, Red (Iron Man Edition) | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | 2412DPC0AG, 2412DPC0AI | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | $ 339.50 / £ 208.05 / € 235.00 / ₹ 21,850 | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 8400 Ultra)
- Ultra-fast 90W charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Potentially less refined software experience
- Camera performance details are unknown
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Polished and reliable Samsung software
- Established brand reputation and support
- Good camera image processing
- Slower processor (Exynos 1380)
- Significantly slower 25W charging
Display Comparison
The Poco X7 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1265 nits compared to the Galaxy A54’s 980 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both displays offer an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED panels), the higher peak brightness of the Poco X7 Pro provides a more vibrant and punchy image. Samsung’s display benefits from its well-tuned color science, but the X7 Pro’s brightness advantage is significant for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but details are limited in the provided data. The Galaxy A54’s strength likely lies in Samsung’s image processing algorithms, known for producing vibrant and shareable photos. The Poco X7 Pro’s camera performance will depend heavily on its sensor size and lens quality, which are not specified. Given the focus on performance, Xiaomi may have prioritized computational photography over raw sensor hardware. The inclusion of 'Photo / Video' for both suggests similar feature sets, but the A54’s established reputation in camera quality gives it an edge without further data.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra in the Poco X7 Pro is a substantial upgrade over the Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54. The Dimensity 8400 Ultra’s octa-core configuration (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725, 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) and 4nm process node deliver significantly higher CPU and GPU performance. The Exynos 1380’s (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) and 5nm process are respectable, but the Poco X7 Pro will handle demanding games and multitasking with greater ease. The architectural differences are key; the Cortex-A725 cores in the Dimensity chip are newer and more efficient than the A78 cores in the Exynos.
Battery Life
The Poco X7 Pro offers a slightly shorter active use battery life (12:43h) compared to the Galaxy A54 (11:15h), but this is offset by its dramatically faster 90W wired charging, achieving 100% charge in just 42 minutes. The Galaxy A54’s 25W charging is considerably slower. While the A54’s older 'Endurance rating' of 119h suggests similar overall longevity, the X7 Pro’s rapid charging capability minimizes downtime, making it more convenient for power users. The difference in charging speed is a major differentiator.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, demanding applications, or simply want the fastest possible Android experience in this price bracket. Its 90W charging is a game-changer for minimizing downtime. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A54 if you prefer a more balanced experience with a focus on software stability, camera versatility, and long-term support, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power.