Poco X7 Pro vs Oppo Reno10 Pro+: Which Mid-Range Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Poco X7 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8400 Ultra chipset, coupled with its impressive 90W charging, provides a compelling package that often undercuts the Reno10 Pro+'s price, making it the better value proposition.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | Oppo Reno10 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 09 | 2023, May 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 09 | Available. Released 2023, May 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic back, silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.33 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.41 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g or 198 g (6.88 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1400 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.5, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4/6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 42 min Reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, QC3 Reverse wired |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 6550 mAh (India only) | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black/Yellow, White, Green, Red (Iron Man Edition) | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple, Gold |
| Models | 2412DPC0AG, 2412DPC0AI | PHU110, CPH2521 |
| Price | $ 339.50 / £ 208.05 / € 235.00 / ₹ 21,850 | About 540 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
- Faster 90W charging (42 minutes to 100%)
- Potentially superior CPU performance with Dimensity 8400 Ultra
- Higher peak display brightness (1265 nits)
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- Camera image processing may not be as refined as Oppo
Oppo Reno10 Pro+
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers strong performance
- Oppo’s ColorOS is generally well-regarded for its smoothness
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Charging speed is slightly slower than Poco X7 Pro
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 may throttle more under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Poco X7 Pro boasts a display capable of reaching 1265 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno10 Pro+’s display specs aren’t provided, Oppo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The lack of LTPO information for either device suggests neither offers dynamically adaptive refresh rates for optimal power efficiency. The Poco’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Reno10 Pro+’s brand reputation suggests a focus on image processing and color science. The Poco X7 Pro, while likely equipped with a capable sensor, may lean towards a more natural, less processed look. The absence of sensor size data prevents a definitive assessment, but the Reno10 Pro+’s positioning suggests a potentially more refined camera experience, assuming Oppo’s software algorithms are well-tuned.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X7 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra (4nm) features a unique CPU configuration – 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725, and 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725 – designed for sustained performance. The Oppo Reno10 Pro+ utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) with a more traditional octa-core setup: 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510. While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 was a flagship chip, the Dimensity 8400 Ultra is designed to compete with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, suggesting a performance edge for the Poco, particularly in multi-core tasks. Thermal management will be crucial; the Dimensity’s efficiency could translate to less throttling under prolonged load.
Battery Life
The Poco X7 Pro delivers an active use battery life of 12:43h, a solid result. Both devices feature 100W wired charging, but the Poco X7 Pro achieves a full charge in just 42 minutes, slightly faster than the Reno10 Pro+'s unspecified charging time. Both support reverse wired charging, adding to their versatility. The Poco’s faster charging speed, combined with a respectable battery life, gives it a slight edge in convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro if you need maximum performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value fast charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who prioritize specs and aren’t heavily invested in the Oppo ecosystem. Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro+ if you prefer a more refined software experience, potentially better camera image processing (though not confirmed by data), and a brand with a strong track record in design and build quality.