Poco X6 vs Redmi Note 13 Pro+: Which Xiaomi Mid-Ranger Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ emerges as the better overall package. Its significantly faster 120W charging (fully charging in 19 minutes) and slightly longer battery life outweigh the Poco X6’s processor advantage, making it ideal for those prioritizing convenience and all-day usability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco X6 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 11 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 12 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.35 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 100% in 44 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5100 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | 23122PCD1G, 23122PCD1I | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | € 279.99 / $ 213.57 / ₹ 17,990 | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.03 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Poco X6
- Stronger CPU for gaming and demanding apps
- Slightly brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Competitive price point
- Slower charging speed (44 minutes)
- Potentially less refined camera system
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Blazing-fast 120W charging (19 minutes)
- Slightly longer battery life
- Likely superior camera capabilities
- Slightly lower peak display brightness
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Both phones feature 4nm chipsets, but their displays differ. The Poco X6 boasts a peak brightness of 1339 nits, exceeding the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s 1283 nits. While the difference isn't massive, the Poco X6 will offer better visibility in direct sunlight. Both likely utilize AMOLED panels, common in this price bracket, but Xiaomi doesn't specify refresh rates in the provided data. The brightness advantage of the Poco X6 is a key differentiator for outdoor users.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn't detail camera specifications beyond 'Photo / Video' for both devices. Given Xiaomi’s recent trends, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely features a higher resolution main sensor, potentially a 200MP unit, and more advanced image processing capabilities. The Poco X6 will likely focus on delivering good value with a capable, but less feature-rich, camera system. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to have the edge in image quality and versatility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, built on a 4nm process, featuring an octa-core CPU with 4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 cores for performance and 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 cores for efficiency. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ employs the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, also on 4nm, but with a different core configuration: 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510. The Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s higher clock speeds on the prime cores suggest stronger single-core performance, while the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s A78 cores may offer better sustained multi-core performance. The choice depends on workload; the Poco X6 will likely shine in graphically intensive tasks, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ may feel snappier in everyday use.
Battery Life
Battery life is remarkably close, with the Poco X6 achieving 10:11 hours of active use and the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ lasting 10:38 hours. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Poco X6 supports 67W wired charging, reaching 100% in 44 minutes, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts 120W charging, fully charging in just 19 minutes. This difference is substantial; the Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s charging speed significantly reduces downtime, making it ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The slightly longer battery life of the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ further solidifies its advantage in this category.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 if you need a phone primarily for gaming or demanding applications and prioritize raw processing power within a tight budget. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 offers a noticeable performance edge. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you prefer a phone that minimizes downtime with incredibly fast charging, offers a slightly longer battery life, and provides a more polished user experience, even if it means sacrificing a small amount of peak CPU performance.