Poco X6 vs. Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the slightly better all-rounder. Its superior battery life – lasting 10:28h in active use – and efficient Dimensity 7030 chipset provide a smoother, more consistent experience. However, gamers and power users will find the Poco X6’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 a more compelling option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco X6 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 11 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 12 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.35 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 100% in 44 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5100 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | 23122PCD1G, 23122PCD1I | XT2307-1 |
| Price | € 279.99 / $ 213.57 / ₹ 17,990 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.03 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Poco X6
- Faster CPU performance for demanding tasks
- Higher peak display brightness for outdoor visibility
- Potentially better gaming performance due to Snapdragon chipset
- Slightly shorter battery life
- Slower full charge time
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Longer battery life for all-day use
- Faster initial charging speed (50% in 15 mins)
- More efficient chipset for sustained performance
- Slightly lower peak display brightness
- Potentially less responsive in extremely demanding apps
Display Comparison
Both phones feature capable displays, but the Poco X6 takes a slight lead with its measured peak brightness of 1339 nits compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s 1073 nits. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (not specified in the data), the higher brightness of the Poco X6 suggests a more vibrant and punchy image. The absence of refresh rate data makes it difficult to assess motion clarity, but both are expected to offer at least 120Hz for smooth scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a definitive comparison is impossible. We can assume both will offer decent image quality in good lighting conditions. The absence of any mention of optical image stabilization (OIS) suggests neither phone prioritizes low-light photography. The usefulness of any included macro cameras (likely 2MP on both) is questionable, serving primarily as a marketing feature.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) boasts a more modern architecture and a higher clock speed on its prime Cortex-A78 cores (2.40 GHz vs 2.5 GHz on the Edge 40 Neo). However, the Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm) benefits from a larger core count (2x A78 + 6x A55 vs 4x A78 + 4x A55). The 6nm process of the Dimensity 7030 contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting the Snapdragon’s architectural advantage in sustained workloads. The Poco X6 will likely excel in short bursts of performance, while the Edge 40 Neo may maintain smoother performance over longer gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo demonstrably wins in battery endurance, achieving 10:28h of active use compared to the Poco X6’s 10:11h. While the difference is relatively small, it’s significant. The Edge 40 Neo also boasts a faster initial charging speed, reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes with its 68W wired charging. The Poco X6’s 67W charging takes 44 minutes to reach 100%, suggesting a slower ramp-up in charging speed after the initial phase. The Dimensity 7030’s 6nm process likely contributes to the Edge 40 Neo’s superior battery efficiency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 if you prioritize gaming performance and responsiveness in demanding applications. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset, built on a 4nm process, delivers a noticeable edge in CPU-intensive tasks. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value battery life, a refined software experience, and a more balanced overall package. The Dimensity 7030 offers excellent efficiency, translating to longer screen-on time and less frequent charging.