Xiaomi offers a plethora of budget-friendly smartphones, making it tough to choose the right one. The Poco X5 and Redmi Note 12S are both compelling options, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X5 edges out the Redmi Note 12S thanks to its superior chipset, brighter display, and significantly longer battery life. While the Redmi Note 12S offers a decent experience, the Poco X5 provides better overall performance and value for money.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 06 | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 07 | Available. Released 2023, April 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.9 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits (HBM), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1), BDS (B1) |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | Stereo FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 60 min | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Jaguar Black, Wildcat Blue, Supernova Green | Onyx Black, Ice Blue, Pearl Green |
| Models | 22111317PG, 22111317PI | 2303CRA44A, 23030RAC7Y, 2303ERA42L |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 122.47 / $ 149.99 / £ 229.89 |
| SAR | 0.84 W/kg (head) 0.68 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 106h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-27.3 LUFS (Good)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 400895 (v9)
GeekBench: 2088 (v5.1) | - |
Xiaomi Poco X5
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 695)
- Brighter Display (728 nits)
- Exceptional Battery Life (106h Endurance)
- Faster Charging (33W)
- Camera may not be as refined as Redmi Note 12S
- Design might be less premium
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
- Potentially better image processing and color accuracy
- More traditional design
- Likely a higher resolution main sensor
- Weaker Performance (Helio G96)
- Lower Battery Life
- Less Bright Display
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 boasts a brighter display with a measured peak brightness of 728 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight. Both phones likely feature AMOLED panels with vibrant colors and deep blacks, but the Poco X5's higher brightness gives it a noticeable advantage. The Redmi Note 12S likely has a slightly more saturated color profile, which some users may prefer.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Redmi Note 12S is often praised for its image processing and color accuracy. While specific camera specs are missing, the Redmi Note 12S likely has a higher resolution main sensor. The Poco X5's camera is still good, but may not match the Redmi Note 12S in certain lighting conditions. Video recording capabilities are likely comparable.
Performance
The Poco X5's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset is significantly more powerful than the Redmi Note 12S's Helio G96. The Snapdragon 695 offers better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance. The Poco X5's 6nm process also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
The Poco X5's battery life is a standout feature, with an endurance rating of 106 hours. This is significantly better than the Redmi Note 12S, which lacks detailed battery specifications but is expected to offer a more average battery life. The Poco X5's efficient chipset contributes to its exceptional battery performance.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Poco X5 is ideal for users prioritizing performance, battery life, and a vibrant display for media consumption. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S is a good choice for those seeking a reliable, everyday smartphone with a focus on photography and a more traditional design, and who don't need the absolute best performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Poco X5 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 12S have NFC?
Yes, the Redmi Note 12S typically includes NFC for contactless payments.
❓ What is the storage and RAM options for each phone?
Both phones typically offer configurations with 6GB or 8GB of RAM and 128GB or 256GB of storage, but specific availability may vary by region.