Poco X5 vs Redmi Note 12 Pro+: Which Xiaomi Mid-Ranger Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing value and all-day battery life, the Poco X5 emerges as the winner. While the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ boasts significantly faster 120W charging, the Poco X5’s superior endurance rating and competitive performance from the Snapdragon 695 5G offer a more balanced package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco X5 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 06 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 07 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 165.9 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 208.4 g (7.34 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 60 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Jaguar Black, Wildcat Blue, Supernova Green | Arctic White, Iceberg Blue, Obsidian Black, Trend edition |
| Models | 22111317PG, 22111317PI | 22101316UCP, 22101316UG |
| Price | About 230 EUR | $ 348.00 / £ 439.00 / € 399.00 / ₹ 29,949 |
| SAR | 0.84 W/kg (head) 0.68 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 106h | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.3 LUFS (Good) | -26.7 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 400895 (v9) GeekBench: 2088 (v5.1) | AnTuTu: 498710 (v9) GeekBench: 2208 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco X5
- Exceptional battery life (106h endurance)
- Competitive performance for the price
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Slower charging speed (60 minutes)
- Potentially less advanced camera system
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (19 minutes)
- More powerful processor (Dimensity 1080)
- Potentially better camera features
- Lower battery endurance (88h)
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
Both the Poco X5 and Redmi Note 12 Pro+ feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical for AMOLED panels. However, the Poco X5’s measured peak brightness of 728 nits is a crucial differentiator. While both will be usable outdoors, the Poco X5 will offer a noticeably brighter image in direct sunlight. Details regarding panel technology (like refresh rate or HDR support) are missing, but given the price points, neither is expected to feature LTPO technology for variable refresh rates. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within their respective price brackets.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are absent. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is likely to feature a more sophisticated camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor (though not specified here). The absence of details regarding sensor size and aperture makes a direct comparison difficult. It's reasonable to assume the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ will offer more advanced image processing features and potentially better low-light performance. The Poco X5 will likely focus on providing a capable camera for everyday use, but may lack the advanced features found on its more expensive sibling. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality.
Performance
The chipset is where the most significant difference lies. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 1080, an octa-core processor with a 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. This represents a step up in raw CPU power compared to the Poco X5’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver). The Dimensity 1080’s Cortex-A78 cores offer better single-core performance, beneficial for app launch speeds and responsiveness. However, the Snapdragon 695 5G benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized software and potentially better GPU performance for gaming, despite the lower clock speeds. Both are built on a 6nm process, suggesting similar efficiency, but the Dimensity 1080’s architecture gives it an edge in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Battery life is a key battleground. The Poco X5 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 106 hours, indicating excellent battery optimization and longevity. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+, despite likely having a similar capacity battery, achieves an endurance rating of only 88 hours. This difference is largely attributable to the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s 120W wired charging, which likely necessitates a more aggressive power management profile. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ advertises a full charge in just 19 minutes, a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The Poco X5 takes 60 minutes to reach 100%, a more standard charging time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco X5 if you need a reliable daily driver with excellent battery life and don't want to compromise on performance for essential tasks and casual gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ if you prioritize incredibly fast charging – getting from 0 to 100% in under 20 minutes – and are willing to trade some battery endurance for that convenience.