Xiaomi Poco X5 vs Poco F5: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster processor, brighter display, and faster charging. While the Poco X5 remains a solid budget option, the F5's upgrades justify its slightly higher price for most users seeking a premium experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco X5 | Xiaomi Poco F5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 06 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 07 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.9 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 60 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Jaguar Black, Wildcat Blue, Supernova Green | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | 22111317PG, 22111317PI | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | 0.84 W/kg (head) 0.68 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 106h | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.3 LUFS (Good) | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 400895 (v9) GeekBench: 2088 (v5.1) | - |
Xiaomi Poco X5
- Excellent battery life
- Affordable price
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Decent display
- Less powerful processor
- Lower display brightness
- Slower charging speed
- Camera details are limited
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Significantly faster processor
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Faster charging (67W)
- Improved camera performance (likely)
- Slightly higher price
- Battery life is slightly less than X5 (though still excellent)
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes a commanding lead in the display department. Its 963 nits max brightness is noticeably brighter than the X5's 728 nits, making it easier to see in direct sunlight. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the F5's superior brightness contributes to a more immersive viewing experience. Both likely use AMOLED panels, but the F5's panel is likely more advanced.
Camera Comparison
While both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities (specific details are missing), the Poco F5's more powerful chipset likely translates to better image processing and video recording quality. Expect improved dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image clarity on the F5. Further research on specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture, features) would be needed for a more definitive comparison.
Performance
The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 in the Poco F5 is a substantial upgrade over the Snapdragon 695 5G in the X5. The F5's CPU architecture (Cortex-X2, A710, A510) provides significantly faster processing speeds, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance. The X5 is still capable, but the F5 is in a different league.
Battery Life
The Poco X5 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 106h, while the Poco F5 achieves 118h. Active use scores show the F5 lasting 11:52h, which is also very good. While the X5 has a slight edge in endurance rating, the F5's faster charging (67W vs 33W) allows it to quickly replenish its battery, making it a more convenient option overall.
Buying Guide
The Poco X5 is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize long battery life and a reliable, everyday smartphone experience. The Poco F5 is perfect for gamers, content creators, and anyone who demands top-tier performance, a vibrant display, and faster charging speeds.