Poco X5 vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite: A Deep Dive into the Snapdragon 695 Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid replenishment, the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite is the clear winner. Its 67W charging, capable of reaching 80% in just 30 minutes, significantly outperforms the Poco X5’s 33W charging. However, the Poco X5’s slightly better endurance rating suggests it can stretch a full charge further.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco X5 | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 06 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 07 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.9 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 165.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 13, OxygenOS 13.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 60 min | 67W wired, 80% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Jaguar Black, Wildcat Blue, Supernova Green | Pastel Lime, Chromatic Gray |
| Models | 22111317PG, 22111317PI | CPH2467, CPH2465 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | £ 169.98 / € 209.99 |
| SAR | 0.84 W/kg (head) 0.68 W/kg (body) | 1.17 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 106h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -27.3 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 400895 (v9) GeekBench: 2088 (v5.1) | AnTuTu: 412006 (v9) GeekBench: 2052 (v5) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco X5
- Longer battery endurance (106h rating)
- Brighter display (728 nits)
- Potentially better value if battery life is paramount
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Limited camera details available
- Display technology unspecified
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite
- Significantly faster charging (67W, 80% in 30min)
- Convenient for quick top-ups
- Modern design aesthetic (based on OnePlus brand reputation)
- Battery endurance data unavailable
- Display brightness unspecified
- Camera details lacking
Display Comparison
Both the Poco X5 and Nord CE 3 Lite lack detailed display specifications in the provided data, but the Poco X5’s measured peak brightness of 728 nits is a crucial data point. This suggests a brighter, more visible screen in outdoor conditions compared to the Nord CE 3 Lite, where brightness remains unspecified. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio listed for the Poco X5 is a nominal specification common to most LCD/OLED panels and doesn't indicate a significant advantage. Without knowing the panel technology (IPS vs AMOLED) or refresh rate of the Nord CE 3 Lite, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack any specifics regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). This makes a direct camera comparison impossible based on the provided data. The absence of details suggests both phones likely employ a standard camera setup for their price range, potentially relying on software processing to enhance image quality. The lack of information regarding the secondary cameras (ultrawide, macro, depth) further limits analysis. Without knowing the megapixel counts or sensor sizes, it's impossible to determine which phone offers superior image quality or versatility.
Performance
The core performance is identical: both phones are powered by the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) with an Octa-core CPU configuration (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver). This means users can expect similar performance in everyday tasks and light gaming. However, thermal management, which isn’t specified, could differentiate real-world sustained performance. The absence of RAM specifications prevents a deeper analysis of multitasking capabilities. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695 is efficient, but sustained loads will still generate heat, and the effectiveness of each phone’s cooling solution will be a key factor.
Battery Life
The Poco X5 boasts an endurance rating of 106 hours, indicating a longer-lasting battery life compared to the Nord CE 3 Lite, for which endurance data is unavailable. However, the Nord CE 3 Lite compensates with significantly faster charging: 67W wired, achieving 80% charge in just 30 minutes, versus the Poco X5’s 33W charging taking 60 minutes for a full charge. This difference in charging speed is substantial, offering a significant convenience factor for users who prioritize quick top-ups. The Poco X5’s longer endurance suggests it can handle a full day of moderate use more comfortably, while the Nord CE 3 Lite relies on its fast charging to mitigate a potentially smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco X5 if you prioritize maximizing battery life and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. This phone is ideal for users who frequently find themselves away from power outlets for extended periods. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite if you value convenience and quick top-ups. This is the better choice for users who prefer to briefly charge their phone throughout the day rather than waiting for a full charge overnight.